SHRAWAN KUMAR PRAJAPATI v. STATE OF U.P. THRU. PRIN. SECY. HOME DEPTT. LKO AND 3 OTHERS
/11768/2025 · 2025-11-28
body2025
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 185586 (ALL) · dailylaw.ai ]
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 185586 (ALL) · dailylaw.ai ]
Judgment text
Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.
HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT ALLAHABAD LUCKNOW CRIMINAL MISC. BAIL APPLICATION No. - 11768 of 2025 Court No. - 12 HON'BLE PANKAJ BHATIA, J.
1. Heard learned counsel for the applicant, learned AGA and perused the record.
2. The applicant seeks enlargement on bail in FIR No. 169 of 2025, under sections 137(2), 87, 65(1) BNS and Sections 5/6 POCSO Act, P.S. Sareni, District Raebareli.
3. Learned counsel for the applicant argues that in terms of FIR it was alleged that daughter of the informant aged about 14 years went missing. Subsequently in her statement under Section 183 BNSS the victim stated that her parents used to beat her and thereafter she went to Gujarat without informing anyone. It was also stated that she had gone as she was beaten by her parents. She did not even named the applicant. Although the name of the applicant was taken in statement under Section 180 BNSS. There is no definite document with regard to exact age of the victim.
4. Learned AGA has opposed the bail application.
5. Considering the statement under Section 183 BNSS, however, without commenting upon the merits of the case, the applicant who is in jail since 1.9.2025 and has no criminal history is entitled to be enlarged on bail. In view thereof, the application is allowed.
6. Let the applicant Shrawan Kumar Prajapati be released on bail in aforesaid FIR number on his furnishing a personal bond with two sureties Versus Counsel for Applicant(s) : Prashant Singh Counsel for Opposite Party(s) : G.A. Shrawan Kumar Prajapati .....Applicant(s) State Of U.P. Thru. Prin. Secy. Home Deptt. Lko And 3 Others .....Opposite Party(s)
of Rs.20,000/- each to the satisfaction of court concerned with the following conditions: (a) The applicant shall execute a bond to undertake to attend the hearings; (b) The applicant shall not commit any offence similar to the offence of which he is accused or suspected of the commission; and (c) The applicant shall not directly or indirectly make any inducement, threat or promise to any person acquainted with the facts of the case so as to dissuade him from disclosing such facts to the Court or to any police officer or tamper with the evidence. November 28, 2025 J. K. Dinkar BAIL No. 11768 of 2025 2 (Pankaj Bhatia,J.) Digitally signed by :- JESHU KUMAR DINKAR High Court of Judicature at Allahabad, Lucknow Bench