SURAJ KUMAR VERMA v. STATE OF U.P. THRU. PRIN. SECY. HOME DEPTT. LKO.
BAIL/2707/2025 · 2025-11-13
Pankaj Bhatia
body2025
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 185584 (ALL) · dailylaw.ai ]
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 185584 (ALL) · dailylaw.ai ]
Judgment text
Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.
HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT ALLAHABAD LUCKNOW CRIMINAL MISC. BAIL APPLICATION No. - 2707 of 2025
Court No. - 12 HON'BLE PANKAJ BHATIA, J.
1. Heard learned counsel for the applicant, learned AGA for the State; Shri Raghvendra Singh, learned counsel for the informant and perused the record. 2. The applicant seeks enlargement on bail in FIR No.233 of 2024, under Section 352, 105 BNS, P.S. Machharehta, District Sitapur. 3. In terms of the FIR it was alleged that on 09.08.2024 the applicant who was in a state of intoxication came to the home of the informant and after hurling abuses started hitting the informant and the husband of the informant with a hammer which resulted in substantial injuries. Subsequently, husband of the informant died on 18.09.2024. Cause of death, as per the postmortem report, is septicemic shock. Statement of the deceased prior to his death is also on record wherein allegations were levelled that the applicant had committed the injury in the state of intoxication. 4. Learned AGA has opposed the bail application. 5. Considering the fact that the material on record suggests that the applicant had allegedly committed the offence in the state of intoxication coupled with the fact that the applicant has no criminal antecedents and the death has occurred after substantial period of time, the applicant is entitled to be enlarged on bail. In view thereof, the application is allowed. 6. Let the applicant Suraj Kumar Verma be released on bail in aforesaid FIR number on his furnishing a personal bond with two sureties of Versus Counsel for Applicant(s) : Rakesh Kumar Tripathi Counsel for Opposite Party(s) : G.A., Raghvendra Singh Suraj Kumar Verma .....Applicant(s) State Of U.P. Thru. Prin. Secy. Home Deptt. Lko. .....Opposite Party(s)
Rs.20,000/- each to the satisfaction of court concerned with the following conditions: (a) The applicant shall execute a bond to undertake to attend the hearings; (b) The applicant shall not commit any offence similar to the offence of which he is accused or suspected of the commission; and (c) The applicant shall not directly or indirectly make any inducement, threat or promise to any person acquainted with the facts of the case so as to dissuade him from disclosing such facts to the Court or to any police officer or tamper with the evidence.
November 13, 2025 nishant BAIL No. 2707 of 2025 2 (Pankaj Bhatia,J.) Digitally signed by :- NISHANT MOHAN High Court of Judicature at Allahabad, Lucknow Bench