PREM CHANDRA PAL @ NANHE v. STATE OF U.P. THRU. PRIN. SECY. HOME LKO.
/12132/2025 · 2025-12-04
Pankaj Bhatia
body2025
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 185578 (ALL) · dailylaw.ai ]
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 185578 (ALL) · dailylaw.ai ]
Judgment text
Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.
HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT ALLAHABAD LUCKNOW CRIMINAL MISC. BAIL APPLICATION No. - 12132 of 2025 Court No. - 12 HON'BLE PANKAJ BHATIA, J.
1. Heard learned counsel for the applicant, learned AGA and perused the record.
2. The applicant seeks enlargement on bail in FIR No.425 of 2025, under sections 69 BNS, P.S. Krishna Nagar, District Lucknow.
3. Learned counsel for the applicant argues that in terms of FIR it was alleged that the informant aged about 36 years came in contact with the applicant around seven years ago and were staying together and on false pretext of marriage physical relations were formed. Subsequently, the applicant refused to marry her. The victim was found to be pregnant.
4. Learned AGA has opposed the bail application.
5. Considering the age of the victim and the fact that the relationship continued over last seven years when section 69 was not there in the statute, however, without commenting upon the merits of the case, the applicant who is in jail since 24.10.2025 and has no criminal history is entitled to be enlarged on bail. In view thereof, the application is allowed.
6. Let the applicant Prem Chandra Pal @ Nanhe be released on bail in aforesaid FIR number on his furnishing a personal bond with two sureties of Rs.20,000/- each to the satisfaction of court concerned with the following conditions: (a) The applicant shall execute a bond to undertake to attend the hearings; Versus Counsel for Applicant(s) : Ashish Shukla, O.P. Tiwari Counsel for Opposite Party(s) : G.A. Prem Chandra Pal @ Nanhe .....Applicant(s) State Of U.P. Thru. Prin. Secy. Home Lko. .....Opposite Party(s)
(b) The applicant shall not commit any offence similar to the offence of which he is accused or suspected of the commission; and (c) The applicant shall not directly or indirectly make any inducement, threat or promise to any person acquainted with the facts of the case so as to dissuade him from disclosing such facts to the Court or to any police officer or tamper with the evidence. December 4, 2025 J. K. Dinkar BAIL No. 12132 of 2025 2 (Pankaj Bhatia,J.) Digitally signed by :- JESHU KUMAR DINKAR High Court of Judicature at Allahabad, Lucknow Bench