AJAY PRATAP VERMA AND ANOTHER v. STATE OF U.P.THRU. PRIN. SECY. HOME LKO.
/5501/2025 · 2025-11-27
Pankaj Bhatia
Public Interest Litigationbody2025
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 185560 (ALL) · dailylaw.ai ]
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 185560 (ALL) · dailylaw.ai ]
Judgment text
Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.
HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT ALLAHABAD LUCKNOW CRIMINAL MISC. BAIL APPLICATION No. - 5501 of 2025 Court No. - 12 HON'BLE PANKAJ BHATIA, J.
1. Heard learned counsel for the applicants, learned AGA for the State and perused the record.
2. The applicants seek enlargement on bail in FIR No. 164 of 2025 under sections 105, 281, 75(2), 115(2), 351(3) BNS, P.S. Banthara, District Lucknow.
3. Learned counsel for the applicants argues that co accused Vikas with similar allegations has been enlarged on bail vide order dated 10.11.2025 passed in Criminal Misc Bail Application No. 5101 of 2025.
4. Learned AGA has opposed the bail application.
5. Considering the facts and circumstances and adopting the same reasoning, however, without commenting upon the merits of the case, the applicants who are in jail since 20.4.2025 and have no criminal history are entitled to be enlarged on bail on the ground of parity. In view thereof, the application is allowed.
6. Let the applicants Ajay Pratap Verma and Rajnish Kumar @ Adarsh be released on bail in aforesaid FIR number on their furnishing a personal bond with two sureties of Rs.20,000/- each to the satisfaction of court concerned with the following conditions: Versus Counsel for Applicant(s) : Manjusha Kapil, Indu Prakash Singh, Kamlesh Singh Counsel for Opposite Party(s) : G.A., Jatin Raheja, Shakti Kumar Sharma, Shobhit Harsh Ajay Pratap Verma And Another .....Applicant(s) State Of U.P.Thru. Prin. Secy. Home Lko. .....Opposite Party(s)
(a) The applicants shall execute a bond to undertake to attend the hearings; (b) The applicants shall not commit any offence similar to the offence of which they are accused or suspected of the commission; and (c) The applicants shall not directly or indirectly make any inducement, threat or promise to any person acquainted with the facts of the case so as to dissuade him from disclosing such facts to the Court or to any police officer or tamper with the evidence. November 27, 2025 J. K. Dinkar BAIL No. 5501 of 2025 2 (Pankaj Bhatia,J.) Digitally signed by :- JESHU KUMAR DINKAR High Court of Judicature at Allahabad, Lucknow Bench