Upputhala Venkayya , v. The State of Andhra Pradesh
WP/16962/2020 · 2025-08-12
Venkata Jyothirmai Pratapa
body2025
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 18556 (AP) · dailylaw.ai ]
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 18556 (AP) · dailylaw.ai ]
Judgment text
Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.
APHC010257382020
IN THE HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH AT AMARAVATI (Special Original Jurisdiction) [3396] WEDNESDAY,THE THIRTEENTH DAY OF AUGUST TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY FIVE PRESENT THE HONOURABLE DR JUSTICE VENKATA JYOTHIRMAI PRATAPA WRIT PETITION NO: 16962/2020 Between:
1. UPPUTHALA VENKAYYA ,, S/O VENKATESWARA RAO, AGED 30 YEARS, OCC PRIVATE JOB, R/O D.NO. 10-381, INDIRA COLONY, KANCHIKACHARLA, KRISHNA DISTRICT
...PETITIONER AND
1. THE STATE OF ANDHRA PRADESH, REPRESENTED BY ITS PRINCIPAL SECRETARY, HOME DEPARTMENT. SECRETARIAT, VELAGAPUDI, GUNTUR DISTRICT.
2. THE STATION HOUSE OFFICER, NANDIGAMA, KRISHNA DISTRICT.
3. THE DEPUTY COMMISSIONER OF PROHIBITION AND EXCISE, VIAJ AYAWADA, KRISHNA DISTRICT.
...RESPONDENT(S): Counsel for the Petitioner:
1. KOLUSU RAVIKIRAN KUMAR Counsel for the Respondent(S):
1. GP FOR HOME
2. GP FOR PROHIBITION EXCISE
2
The Court made the following:
ORDER:
This Writ Petition is filed under Article 226 of Constitution of India with the following prayer for:
“…to issue a Writ, order or direction, especially one in the nature of Writ of Mandamus, declaring the action of the 2nd respondent in not releasing the vehicle Motorcycle(Yamaha FZ) bearing registration number AP 16 DK 0626 seized in connection with Cr.No. 568/2020, dt 14-6-2020, of Nandigama Police Station, Krishna District, inspite my ready and willing to furnish necessary security as illegal, arbitrary and unjust and consequently direct the 2nd respondent to release the vehicle Motorcycle(Yamaha FZ) bearing registration number AP 16 DK 0626 and pass....…”
2. Heard Sri Kolusu Ravi Kiran Kumar, learned Counsel for the petitioner and Sri V.Farooq, learned Assistant Government Pleader for Home for the respondents.
3.
Learned counsel for the petitioner would submit that this petition is filed seeking a direction to the police for releasing of vehicle which was seized relating to an excise offence.
4. Learned Assistant Government Pleader would submit that Court may pass appropriate orders.
5. In that view, this writ petition is disposed of. However, the concerned police are directed to look into the representation of the petitioner for release of the vehicle and take appropriate decision according to governing rules and law, if not released by this date. There shall be no order as to costs.
3
As a sequel thereto, miscellaneous petitions pending, if any, shall stand closed. _________________________________________
Dr. JUSTICE VENKATAJYOTHIRMAI PRATAPA Date: 13.08.2025 MH
4
HON’BLE DR. JUSTICE VENKATAJYOTHIRMAI PRATAPA
94
W.P.No.16962 of 2020
Dated: 13.08.2025
MH