Research › Search › Judgment

Allahabad High Court · body

2025 DAILYLAW 185559 (ALL)

RAMESH KUMAR v. STATE OF U.P. THRU. ITS ADDL. CHIEF SECY. DEPTT. OF HOME U.P. GOVT. LKO. AND OTHERS

/4103/2024 · 2025-11-19

Pramod Kumar Srivastava, Rajiv Gupta

body2025

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT ALLAHABAD LUCKNOW CRIMINAL MISC. WRIT PETITION No. - 4103 of 2024 Court No. - 30 HON'BLE RAJIV GUPTA, J. HON'BLE PRAMOD KUMAR SRIVASTAVA, J. At the very outset, learned A.G.A. for the State has pointed out that in the instant case, the investigation has already been concluded, and the charge sheet has been filed against the accused. As such the present writ petition has been rendered infructuous. Learned counsel for the petitioner, who is the first informant, does not dispute the aforesaid fact. In view of the statement made, the present writ petition is dismissed as having been rendered infructuous. November 19, 2025 Arvind Versus Counsel for Petitioner(s) : Hemant Kumar Mishra Counsel for Respondent(s) : G.A. (Pramod Kumar Srivastava,J.) (Rajiv Gupta,J.) Ramesh Kumar .....Petitioner(s) State Of U.P. Thru. Its Addl. Chief Secy. Deptt. Of Home U.P. Govt. Lko. And Others .....Respondent(s) Digitally signed by :- ARVIND KUMAR SRIVASTAVA High Court of Judicature at Allahabad, Lucknow Bench