HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT ALLAHABAD LUCKNOW CONTEMPT APPLICATION (CIVIL) No. - 2617 of 2014 Court No. - 8 HON'BLE MANISH KUMAR, J. Learned counsel for the applicant has submitted that though the order has been complied with but he is disputing the order passed by the respondent, otherwise for all practical purposes, the present contempt application has become infructuous and the same may be dismissed as infructuous, with liberty to the applicant if he is still aggrieved by the order passed by the respondent, he may be permitted to challenge the same by filing a writ petition. In view of above, the present contempt petition is dismissed as infructuous. Notice, if any, stands discharged. It is always open for the applicant to avail the remedy as may be permissible under the law. November 26, 2025 Nitesh Versus Counsel for Applicant(s) : Arun Kumar Pandey, Himanshu Shukla, K.R Pandey, Lalit Kishore Tiwari Counsel for Opposite Party(s) : C S C (Manish Kumar,J.) Shushil Kumar Pandey .....Applicant(s) Chanchal Kumar Tiwari Secy. Panchayati Raj Deptt. And Ors. .....Opposite Party(s) Digitally signed by :- NITESH KUMAR TEWARY High Court of Judicature at Allahabad, Lucknow Bench