HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT ALLAHABAD LUCKNOW APPLICATION U/S 482 No. - 10782 of 2025 Court No. - 14 HON'BLE RAJEEV SINGH, J. 1. Vakalatnama filed by Sri Alok Kumar Srivastava, Advocate on behalf of opposite party no.2 is taken on record. 2. Heard learned counsel for the applicant, learned counsel for opposite party no.2, learned A.G.A. for the State and perused the record. 3. The instant application has been filed with the following prayer:- "To quash the impugned charge-sheet no. 53/2013 dated 10.03.2013 filed in Case Crime No. 61/2013 u/s 420, 467, 468 and 471 IPC, lodged at P.S. Sarojani Nagar, District- Lucknow, alongwith summoning order dated 29.05.2013 passed by learned Court of Judicial Magistrate IIIrd, Lucknow, in Criminal Case No. 1170/2013 (State of U.P. Versus Chandrajit Yadav) including entire proceedings in pursuance thereof." 4. The parties are present today. 5. Learned counsel for the applicant submits that genesis of the case in question is the dispute arose between the private respondent and her in- laws and the issue has already been resolved between the parties by way of the compromise. He further submits that the applicant is present today alongwith draft of amount of Rs. 10 lakhs. 6. The aforesaid original draft placed before this Court is handed over to the private respondent. Versus Counsel for Applicant(s) : Vishnu Kumar Srivastava, Kaushlendra Kumar, Shweta Srivastava Counsel for Opposite Party(s) : G.A. Chandrajit Yadav .....Applicant(s) State Of U.P. Thru. Addl. Chief Secy. Deptt. Of Home Lko. And Another .....Opposite Party(s) 7. Photocopy of the aforesaid draft placed before this Court is taken on record. 8. Learned counsel for the applicant submits that both the parties have amicably compromised their dispute. The compromise which has taken place between the parties is also filed before this Court as Annexure No.4 to the application. 9. Whether the parties have, in fact, compromised the matter or not, can best be ascertained by the trial court concerned as such compromise has to be duly verified in presence of the parties concerned before the Court. 10. Accordingly, this application is disposed of with a direction to the trial court concerned that if any such compromise is filed before it, it shall issue notices to all the signatories to the compromise requiring their personal presence and, thereafter, proceed to verify the compromise. If the aforesaid compromise is verified, a report to that effect shall be prepared by the court and the compromise will be made part of the record. 11. The court concerned in that scenario will allow the parties to obtain certified copy of the report as well as compromise and it will be open to the applicant to approach this Court again for quashing of the proceedings. 12. For a period of one month, no coercive action shall be taken against the applicant in the aforesaid case. 13. Office is directed to return the original compromise deed, if any, to the learned counsel for the applicant, after taking the photocopy of the same. December 18, 2025 Arpan A482 No. 10782 of 2025 2 (Rajeev Singh,J.) Digitally signed by :- ARPAN High Court of Judicature at Allahabad, Lucknow Bench