YOGEETA BARKOO HARNE v. THE STATE OF MAHARASHTRA THROUGH ITS CHIEF PRINCIPAL SECRETARY AND OTHERS
WP/6462/2025 · 2025-05-09
Shri R G Avachat, Shri Sandipkumar C More
body2025
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 18555 (BOM) · dailylaw.ai ]
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 18555 (BOM) · dailylaw.ai ]
Judgment text
Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.
W.P. No.6462/2025 :: 1 ::
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE OF BOMBAY BENCH AT AURANGABAD WRIT PETITION NO.6462 OF 2025 Yogeeta Barkoo Harne … PETITIONER VERSUS The State of Maharashtra & ors.
… RESPONDENTS ....... Mr. S.B. Ghatol Patil, Advocate for petitioner Mr. D.R. Korade, A.G.P. for State Mr. Nikam, Advocate for R.No.4 and 5 ....…
CORAM : R.G. AVACHAT AND SANDIPKUMAR C. MORE, JJ.
DATE : 9th MAY, 2025 O R D E R : Not on board. Taken on board.
1. Heard.
2. Issue notice to the respondents. Learned A.G.P. waives service of notice for respondent Nos.1 to 3. Learned advocates Mr. Nikam waives service of notice for respondent Nos.4 and 5. 2025:BHC-AUG:14184-DB
W.P. No.6462/2025 :: 2 ::
3. Learned Advocate for respondent No.2 makes a statement that the petitioner would be allowed to fill in Online form, he would be permitted to appear for examination and their result would also be declared in due course.
4. Learned Advocate for respondent No.2 places on record a Form of revised TAIT examination form. After having gone through the draft Form, the petitioner is satisfied that her grievance stands redressed and as such, nothing survives in the petition.
5. The petition stands disposed of in view of the statement made by learned Advocates for respondent Nos.4 and 5 and revised examination form.
(SANDIPKUMAR C. MORE, J.)
(R.G. AVACHAT, J.)
fmp/-