HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT ALLAHABAD LUCKNOW APPLICATION U/S 528 BNSS No. - 1812 of 2025 Court No. - 16 HON'BLE BRIJ RAJ SINGH, J. Power filed by Sri Yogesh Somvanshi and Sri Anil Kumar Verma, Advocates on behalf of opposite party no.2 is taken on record. Heard learned counsel for the applicants, learned AGA for the State, learned counsel for the opposite party no.2 and perused the record. The present application has been filed with the following main prayer: "Wherefore, it is most respectfully prayed that this Hon'ble Court may kindly be pleased to quash the impugned Charge Sheet dated 27.01.2025 as contained in Annexure No. 1 to this petition, the impugned Cognizance/Summoning order dated 11/04/2025 passed by the Ld. Court of Ld. Civil Judge (Sr. Div.) F.T.C./ Additional Chief Judicial Magistrate, Faizabad/Ayodhya in Case No. 272/2025; State Vs. Ajeet Verma & Others, Case Crime No.0006/2025 Under Sections- 85, 115(2), 352 of B.N.S. and 3/4 Dowry Prohibition Act, 1961, Police Station- Gosainganj, District- Ayodhya as contained in Annexure No. 2 to this petition and the entire proceedings of the Case No. 272/2025; State Vs. Ajeet Verma & Others, Case Crime No. 0006/2025 Under Sections- 85, 115(2), 352 of B.N.S. and 3/4 Dowry Prohibition Act, 1961, Police Station- Gosainganj, District- Ayodhya, pending before the Ld. Judicial Magistrate, Third, Faizabad/Ayodhya, in the interest of justice." Learned counsel for the applicants submits that the parties have amicably Versus Counsel for Applicant(s) : Chandan Srivastava Counsel for Opposite Party(s) : G.A. Smt. Sheela @ Sheela Devi .....Applicant(s) State Of U.P. Thru. Addl. Chief Secy. Deptt. Of Home Lko. And Another .....Opposite Party(s) settled their dispute and a compromise has been arrived between them dated 21.01.2025 (Original copy of the same is appended as Annexure-4 to the application). Whether the parties have, in fact, compromised the matter or not, can best be ascertained by the Court below, before which, the case is pending. Therefore, the compromise has to be duly verified in presence of the parties concerned before the Court below itself. Counsel for opposite party no.2 has no objection, in case compromise takes place. Both the parties are directed to appear before the concerned court below on 25.11.2025 and file/pursue their compromise application. The court below is directed to pass an order on the said compromise application and all formalities will be completed within eight weeks from that date. The concerned Magistrate will sent a report to this Court whether the said compromise took place or not. Accordingly, the present application stands disposed of with a direction to the court concerned that if any such compromise is filed before it or has been already filed, it shall issue notices to all the signatories to the compromise requiring their personal presence and, thereafter, proceed to verify the compromise. If the aforesaid compromise is verified, a report to that effect shall be prepared by the court and the compromise will be made part of the record. The court in that scenario will allow the parties to obtain certified copy of the report as well as compromise and it will be open to the applicants to approach this Court again for quashing of the proceedings. For a period of three months, no coercive action shall be taken against the applicants in the aforesaid case. Registry is directed to return the original copy of the compromise deed to the learned counsel for the applicants after taking photocopy of the same. November 18, 2025 Sachin NA528 No. 1812 of 2025 2 (Brij Raj Singh,J.) Digitally signed by :- SACHIN MEHROTRA High Court of Judicature at Allahabad, Lucknow Bench