Research › Search › Judgment

Allahabad High Court · body

2025 DAILYLAW 185541 (ALL)

JAMALUDDIN SHAIKH v. STATE OF U.P. THRU. PRIN. SECY. DEPTT. REVENUE CIVIL SECTT. LKO AND 5 OTHERS

WPIL/1233/2025 · 2025-12-10

Subhash Vidyarthi

Public Interest Litigationbody2025

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT ALLAHABAD LUCKNOW PUBLIC INTEREST LITIGATION (PIL) No. - 1233 of 2025 Court No. - 17 HON'BLE SUBHASH VIDYARTHI, J. Shri Ram Singh, the learned counsel for the petitioner accepts that due to numerous defects in the petition including defective prayer and defective array of parties, he does not want to press the writ petition and seeks liberty to file a fresh petition. Shri Hariom Singh, the learned State Counsel and Shri Pankaj Gupta, the learned counsel for the Gaon Sabha have no objection to the aforesaid prayer. Accordingly, the writ petition is dismissed as not pressed with the aforesaid liberty. December 10, 2025 -Amit K- Versus Counsel for Petitioner(s) : Ram Singh Counsel for Respondent(s) : C.S.C., Pankaj Gupta (Subhash Vidyarthi,J.) Jamaluddin Shaikh .....Petitioner(s) State Of U.P. Thru. Prin. Secy. Deptt. Revenue Civil Sectt. Lko And 5 Others .....Respondent(s) Digitally signed by :- AMIT KUMAR High Court of Judicature at Allahabad, Lucknow Bench