SMT. VINDHYAWASINI DEVI AND ANOTHER v. STATE OF U.P. THRU. PRIN. SECY. DEPTT. OF BASIC SHIKSHA AND 3 OTHERS
/13380/2025 · 2025-11-20
body2025
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 185538 (ALL) · dailylaw.ai ]
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 185538 (ALL) · dailylaw.ai ]
Judgment text
Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.
HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT ALLAHABAD LUCKNOW WRIT - A No. - 13380 of 2025 Court No. - 18 HON'BLE SHREE PRAKASH SINGH, J. Heard learned counsel for the petitioners, learned counsel for the State, Dr. Udai Veer Singh, learnerd counsel for the opposite parrty no. 3 and perused the record. Instant writ petition has been filed with the following main relief :- (i)Issue, a writ, order or direction in the nature of mandamus directing to opposite parties/competent respondent to appoint the petitioner no. 2 on the place of the son of petitioner no. 1 under the dying harness rule 1974 who has died on 11.08.2024 in train accident (suicide). After arguing at some length, learned counsel for the petitioners submits that the interest of justice would be sub-served if this Hon'ble Court may be pleased to give liberty to the petitioners to move a fresh representation before the opposite party no. 3/District Basic Education Officer, District-Gonda and the opposite party no. 3 may be directed to consider and decide the same within the stipulated period of time, as may be fixed by this court. Learned counsels appearing for the opposite parties have no objection to the contentions aforesaid. Be that as it may, without entering into the merits of the case,the petitioner is given liberty to move a fresh representation, while raising all his claims and grounds before the opposite party no. 3/District Basic Education Officer, District-Gonda within a period of 15 days form today and if such representation is moved within Versus Counsel for Petitioner(s) : Moti Lal Yadav, Uma Shanker Shukla Counsel for Respondent(s) : C.S.C., Uday Veer Singh Smt. Vindhyawasini Devi And Another .....Petitioner(s) State Of U.P. Thru. Prin. Secy. Deptt. Of Basic Shiksha And 3 Others .....Respondent(s)
aforesaid period, the opposite party no. 3 is directed to consider and decide the same within further period of two months, in accordance with law. With the aforesaid observations, the writ petition is hereby disposed of. November 20, 2025 AKS WRIA No. 13380 of 2025 2 (Shree Prakash Singh,J.) Digitally signed by :- ANUJ KRISHNA SRIVASTAVA High Court of Judicature at Allahabad, Lucknow Bench