Research › Search › Judgment

Allahabad High Court · body

2025 DAILYLAW 185527 (ALL)

SANTOSH KUMAR VERMA v. STATE OF U.P. THRU. PRIN. SECY. REVENUE LKO. AND 5 OTHERS

/1206/2025 · 2025-11-26

Public Interest Litigationbody2025

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT ALLAHABAD LUCKNOW PUBLIC INTEREST LITIGATION (PIL) No. - 1206 of 2025 Court No. - 6 HON'BLE JASPREET SINGH, J. 1. The instant petition has been preferred seeking the following reliefs:- "(i) Issue a writ, order or direction in the nature of mandamus commanding and directing to the State authorities to remove the illegal encroachment over the pond land i.e. Gata No.472 minmumla are 0.018 hec situated at village Badaunadih, Pargana Aldemau, Tahsil Kadipur, District Sultanpur by the opposite parties no.6, in the interest of justice. (ii) Issue a writ, order or direction in the nature of Mandamus commanding and directing to the State authorities to decide the recall application regard to the illegal encroachment over the Pond land i.e. Gata No.472 minjumla are 0.018 hec situated at village Badaunadih, Pargana Aldemau, Tahsil Kadipur, District Sultanpur by the opposite party no.6, in the interest of justice." 2. The petitioner who otherwise is merely the resident of the Gaon Sabha concerned has filed the instant petition in public interest. 3. On the perusal of the instant petition, it would reveal that the petitioner has not indicated his credentials. In so far as the issue that the petitioner had made a complaint, the record would indicate that the authorities have already taken note of it and proceedings under section 67 of the U.P. Revenue Code 2006 have already been Versus Counsel for Petitioner(s) : Sudhir Kumar Misra, Gaurav Singh, Zeba Haneef (Km.) Counsel for Respondent(s) : C.S.C., Mohan Singh Santosh Kumar Verma .....Petitioner(s) State Of U.P. Thru. Prin. Secy. Revenue Lko. And 5 Others .....Respondent(s) initiated which are engaging the attention of the authority concerned. 4. In this view of the matter, this Court does not find that there is any public interest involved and that too at the behest of the petitioner who is merely a complainant and once his complaint has already been taken note of, he does not have the right to claim the reliefs as quoted herein above. 5. In view of the aforesaid, the petition lacks merit and is, accordingly, dismissed. November 26, 2025 ank WPIL No. 1206 of 2025 2 (Jaspreet Singh,J.) Digitally signed by :- ALI NEWAZ KHAN High Court of Judicature at Allahabad, Lucknow Bench