VIJAY KUMAR TRIPATHI v. STATE BANK OF INDIA THRU. BRANCH MANAGER BRANCH MAHANAGAR LKO.
/10478/2025 · 2025-11-28
body2025
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 185518 (ALL) · dailylaw.ai ]
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 185518 (ALL) · dailylaw.ai ]
Judgment text
Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.
HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT ALLAHABAD LUCKNOW WRIT - C No. - 10478 of 2025 Court No. - 3 HON'BLE SHEKHAR B. SARAF, J.
HON'BLE MANJIVE SHUKLA, J.
1. Heard learned counsel appearing on behalf of the parties.
2. Learned counsel appearing on behalf of respondent no.2 files a short counter affidavit indicating that the dishonour memo of cheque no.009091 has been traced and the same has been provided to the petitioner. With regard to the cheque no.009096, he submits that the said dishonour memo for the said cheque is not traceable with the bank. He further submits that said dishonour memo, being ten years old, may not be traceable at this point.
3. The said short counter affidavit is taken on record.
3. In light of the above, we are of the view that no further orders can be passed in the writ petition.
4. Accordingly, the writ petition is disposed of.
5. The petitioner shall be at liberty to obtain further orders from the court concerned wherein the cheque bouncing case is pending. November 28, 2025 Renu/- Versus Counsel for Petitioner(s) : Ajay Bahadur Yadav Counsel for Respondent(s) : Anurag Srivastava, Kumar Jaikrit (Manjive Shukla,J.) (Shekhar B. Saraf,J.) Vijay Kumar Tripathi .....Petitioner(s) State Bank Of India Thru. Branch Manager Branch Mahanagar Lko. .....Respondent(s) Digitally signed by :- RENU AGARWAL High Court of Judicature at Allahabad, Lucknow Bench