HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT ALLAHABAD LUCKNOW CRIMINAL MISC. WRIT PETITION No. - 10172 of 2025 Court No. - 10 HON'BLE RAJNISH KUMAR, J. HON'BLE ZAFEER AHMAD, J. 1. In deference to the order dated 28.10.2025, the petitioner and respondent no. 5 are present in person. 2. Learned AGA on the basis of instructions dated 3.11.2025 received from Sri Umesh Kumar Verma, SI, P.S. Sonwa, District Shrawasti, a copy of which has been produced before the Court and is taken on record, submits that since the petitioner herself filed the present petition and received the copy of the admit card for her examinations from the institution in question, therefore, she is not missing and the missing report No. 040 dated 3.11.2025 lodged by the father of the petitioner has been closed. 3. It has further been submitted that the order passed by this Court is being complied with. It has also been submitted that the petitioner is living peacefully and no interference is being made in her peaceful living by the police. 4. The only grievance of the petitioner at this stage is that she should not be compelled by respondent no. 4 who is father of the petitioner and her family members for her marriage as she wants to study further and appear in competitive examinations. In regard to the said apprehension, respondent no. 5 had already stated on the last date i.e. 28.10.2025 that he would not press the petitioner for marriage unless she is ready for the Versus Counsel for Petitioner(s) : Deepak Kumar Pandey, Azizullah Khan Counsel for Respondent(s) : G.A., Garima Singh Jigyasa Mishra .....Petitioner(s) State Of U.P. Thru. Prin. Secy. Deptt. Of Home And 4 Others .....Respondent(s) same. 5. It has also been noticed by us that the petitioner is not residing at her maternal home and is residing elsewhere and she has not given her address in the petition and even on asking today also, she has not disclosed her address though she stated that she is residing in P.G. with one Ms. Rafia. 6. In view of above, since the petitioner has not disclosed her present address, the petition itself is not maintainable. 7. Insofar as the grievance of the petitioner is concerned, in view of the statement of respondent no. 5, no further order is required to be passed at this moment. 8. Today also, respondent no. 5 on a query, has stated that since the petitioner is not residing with him, therefore, the question of pressurizing the petitioner for marriage with his will by him or the family members, does not arise and he shall not have any concern if anything happens on account of her separate living. 9. Learned counsel for respondent no. 5 further submitted that the original educational documents of the petitioner are deposited in the college as the same were deposited for correction which is not disputed by learned counsel for the petitioner. He states that the petitioner may receive the same from the college and he will not have any objection for the same. He undertakes not to interfere in any manner with the life and liberty of the petitioner. 10. In view of above, no interference is required in the matter and the petition is disposed of in terms of the statement of the parties. November 6, 2025 Fahim/- CRLP No. 10172 of 2025 2 (Zafeer Ahmad,J.) (Rajnish Kumar,J.) Digitally signed by :- MOHD FAHIM AKHTAR High Court of Judicature at Allahabad, Lucknow Bench