Research › Search › Judgment

Allahabad High Court · body

2025 DAILYLAW 18551 (ALL)

RADHEY AJEEVIKA SWAYAM SAHAYTA SAMUH THROUGH ITS CHAIRMN, VILLAGE AND POST JAMUNI AND ANOTHER v. STATE OF U.P. AND 7 OTHERS

WRIC/7613/2025 · 2025-03-16

Prakash Padia

body2025

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

Neutral Citation No. - 2025:AHC:36977 Court No. - 33 Case :- WRIT - C No. - 7613 of 2025 Petitioner :- Radhey Ajeevika Swayam Sahayta Samuh Through Its Chairmn, Village And Post Jamuni And Another Respondent :- State Of U.P. And 7 Others Counsel for Petitioner :- B.S. Pandey,Kartikey Pandey Counsel for Respondent :- C.S.C.,Pankaj Kumar Gupta Hon'ble Prakash Padia,J. 1. Heard Sri Kartikey Pandey, learned counsel for the petitioner, learned Standing Counsel for the respondents no.1 to 6 and Sri Pankaj Kumar Gupta, learned counsel for the respondent no.7. 2. The objections raised by the petitioner against the proposal of the Gram Sabha for selection of respondent no.8 has been rejected vide order dated 20.12.2024 hence present writ petition. 3. A preliminary objection has been raised by Sri Pankaj Kumar Gupta, learned counsel for the respondent no.7 that after the proposal was made by the Gram Sabha dated 19.07.2024, the respondent no.8 was appointed as Fair Price Shop Dealer vide order dated 26.09.2024, since the aforesaid order is not under challenged hence present writ petition is not maintainable and liable to be dismissed. 4. In response to the same, it is argued by counsel for the petitioner that the aforesaid order has never been served upon the petitioner and a prayer has been made by counsel for the petitioner to dismiss present writ petition as not pressed with liberty to file fresh writ petition. 5. This prayer has not been opposed by the counsel for the respondents. 6. Prayer made is allowed. 7. The writ petition is dismissed with liberty as prayed. Order Date :- 17.3.2025 Pramod Tripathi Digitally signed by :- PRAMOD TRIPATHI High Court of Judicature at Allahabad