Research › Search › Judgment

Allahabad High Court · body

2025 DAILYLAW 185501 (ALL)

MARUT SUT TIWARI v. STATE OF U.P. THRU. ITS PRIN. SECY. HOME LKO. AND 6 OTHERS

CRLP/10312/2025 · 2025-11-04

Abdul Moin, Babita Rani

body2025

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT ALLAHABAD LUCKNOW CRIMINAL MISC. WRIT PETITION No. - 10312 of 2025 Court No. - 11 HON'BLE ABDUL MOIN, J. HON'BLE MRS. BABITA RANI, J. Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and Sri Anurag Verma, learned AGA on behalf of State-respondents no. 1 to 4. In view of proposed order, notices to opposite party nos. 5 to 7 are hereby dispensed with. This writ petition has been filed with a prayer to issue a writ, order or direction in the nature of Mandamus commanding the opposite parties no. 1 to 4 to issue a direction to opposite party no. 5 not to harass the petitioner and his family members and ensure the security and life of petitioner along with his family members. At the very outset, learned AGA on the basis of instructions sent by Sri Hemant Bhushan Singh, Inspector, STF Headquarters, Lucknow dated Nil of 2025 states that on the basis of complaint that has been received from respondent nos. 6 and 7, the matter is being enquired into Section 173(3) of BNSS, 2023. He further states that petitioner has neither been harassed nor any harassment of the petitioner shall take place and there is no FIR against the petitioner. The aforesaid statement of the learned AGA has been recorded. In view of above, the writ petition stands disposed of. November 4, 2025 AKK Versus Counsel for Petitioner(s) : Lalit Kishore Tiwari, Anand Dubey, Sumit Kumar Srivastava Counsel for Respondent(s) : G.A. (Mrs. Babita Rani,J.) (Abdul Moin,J.) Marut Sut Tiwari .....Petitioner(s) State Of U.P. Thru. Its Prin. Secy. Home Lko. And 6 Others .....Respondent(s) Digitally signed by :- AMIT KUMAR High Court of Judicature at Allahabad, Lucknow Bench