SHAKTI JASROTIA v. UT OF J AND K TH DEPUTY COMMISSIONER JAMMU AND OTHERS
WP(C)/188/2025 · 2025-01-30
Wasim Sadiq Nargal
Writ Petition (Civil)body2025
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 1855 (JK) · dailylaw.ai ]
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 1855 (JK) · dailylaw.ai ]
Judgment text
Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.
HIGH COURT OF JAMMU & KASHMIR AND LADAKH AT JAMMU
Case: WP(C) No. 188/2025
Shakti Jasrotia
..... Petitioner(s)
Through :- Mr. Rajinder Singh Jamwal, Advocate
Vs
U.T. of J&K and Ors. .....Respondent(s)
Through :-
CORAM:
HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE WASIM SADIQ NARGAL, JUDGE
ORDER 30.01.2025
While the matter was being argued, it has come to fore that there are some typographical errors in the instant petition. However, learned counsel for the petitioner seeks withdrawal of the instant petition with a liberty to file fresh. His statement is taken on record.
In view of the statement made by the learned counsel for the petitioner, the instant petition is dismissed as withdrawn, with liberty as prayed for.
(WASIM SADIQ NARGAL)
JUDGE
JAMMU 30.01.2025 Mihul
Sr. No. 33