HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT ALLAHABAD LUCKNOW WRIT - C No. - 1001248 of 2006 Court No. - 4 HON'BLE IRSHAD ALI, J. 1. Seen the office report dated 30.10.2025, whereby it has been reported that registered post card notice issued to the petitioner has not been received back nor any Vakalatnama has been filed till date, thus, service of notice is deemed sufficient upon the petitioner in view of the provision contained under Chapter VIII Rule 12 Explanation II of the High Court Rules. 2. List has been revised. None for the petitioner. 3. The case is dismissed for want of prosecution. Interim order, if any, is vacated. October 31, 2025 Gautam Versus Counsel for Petitioner(s) : V.K.Pandey Counsel for Respondent(s) : C.S.C. (Irshad Ali,J.) Ishrat Ali .....Petitioner(s) Upper Ayukt Lucknow Division Lucknow And Others .....Respondent(s) Digitally signed by :- GAUTAM TECKCHANDANI High Court of Judicature at Allahabad, Lucknow Bench