KAKE YADAV IN FIR @ MAHESH v. STATE OF U.P. THRU. PRIN. SECY. HOME AND 3 OTHERS
/11637/2025 · 2025-12-15
body2025
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 185487 (ALL) · dailylaw.ai ]
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 185487 (ALL) · dailylaw.ai ]
Judgment text
Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.
HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT ALLAHABAD LUCKNOW CRIMINAL MISC. WRIT PETITION No. - 11637 of 2025 Court No. - 11 HON'BLE ABDUL MOIN, J.
HON'BLE MRS. BABITA RANI, J. Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and learned AGA appearing for the State-respondents. After arguing the matter at some length, learned counsel for petitioner prays that he may be permitted to withdraw the writ petition with liberty to pursue other remedies that may be available to him under law.
Learned counsel for respondents has no objection to the prayer made by
learned counsel for the petitioner. Accordingly, the writ petition is dismissed as withdrawn with aforesaid liberty. December 15, 2025 AKK Versus Counsel for Petitioner(s) : Umesh Kumar Maurya, Vikas Maurya Counsel for Respondent(s) : G.A. (Mrs. Babita Rani,J.) (Abdul Moin,J.) Kake Yadav In Fir @ Mahesh .....Petitioner(s) State Of U.P. Thru. Prin. Secy. Home And 3 Others .....Respondent(s) Digitally signed by :- AMIT KUMAR High Court of Judicature at Allahabad, Lucknow Bench