Research › Search › Judgment

Allahabad High Court · body

2025 DAILYLAW 185484 (ALL)

OM PRAKASH AND 3 OTHERS v. STATE OF U.P. THRU. PRIN. SECY. REVENUE DEPTT. LKO. AND 3 OTHERS

WRIC/10872/2025 · 2025-11-13

Prashant Kumar, Shekhar B Saraf

body2025

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT ALLAHABAD LUCKNOW WRIT - C No. - 10872 of 2025 Court No. - 3 HON'BLE SHEKHAR B. SARAF, J. HON'BLE PRASHANT KUMAR, J. 1. Heard learned counsel for the parties. 2. This is a writ petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of India wherein the writ petitioner has made following main prayer(s): "i. Issue a writ of certiorari or any other appropriate writ, order or direction, to summon the records pertaining to the order passed by opposite party no. 2 i.e. District-Magistrate, District- Gonda, whereby the claim of the petitioners under "Mukhyamantri Kisan Durghatna Kalyan Yojna" has been rejected, and to quash the said order as being illegal, arbitrary, and violative of principles of natural justice. ii. Issue a writ, order or direction in the nature of mandamus commanding and directing the respondents to reconsider the claim of the petitioners for grant of compensation under " Mukhyamantri Kisan Durghatna Kalyan Yojna" as according to law forthwith." 3. Learned counsel for the respondents submits that the order of rejection was passed on May 15, 2025, wherein the ground taken by the authorities is that the deceased was not a bhumidhar. Versus Counsel for Petitioner(s) : Subhash Chandra Yadav, Ashwani Kumar Counsel for Respondent(s) : C.S.C. Om Prakash And 3 Others .....Petitioner(s) State Of U.P. Thru. Prin. Secy. Revenue Deptt. Lko. And 3 Others .....Respondent(s) 4. Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that father-in-law of the deceased was the land owner and the deceased was working in his field. He has produced documents to indicate veracity of the submission made. 5. In light of the same, the order of rejection dated May 15, 2025 is quashed and set aside so far as it relates to the petitioner with direction to the authorities to reconsider the claim of the petitioner in accordance with law. 6. With the above direction, writ petition is disposed of. November 13, 2025 Anupam S/- WRIC No. 10872 of 2025 2 (Prashant Kumar,J.) (Shekhar B. Saraf,J.) Digitally signed by :- ANUPAM SINGH PATEL High Court of Judicature at Allahabad, Lucknow Bench