Research › Search › Judgment

Allahabad High Court · body

2025 DAILYLAW 185465 (ALL)

MAHKU v. U.P. JAL NIGAM (RURAL ) THRU. MANAGING DIRECTOR LKO. AND 2 OTHERS

/13335/2025 · 2025-11-19

Shree Prakash Singh

body2025

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT ALLAHABAD LUCKNOW WRIT - A No. - 13335 of 2025 Court No. - 18 HON'BLE SHREE PRAKASH SINGH, J. Heard Ms. Savita Jain, learned counsel for the petitioner, Mr. Rishabh Kapoor, learned counsel for the respondent(s). Instant petition has been filed with the following reliefs:- "(a) To issue a writ, order or direction in the nature of mandamus commanding and directing the Opp. party No. 2 to treat the petitioner as Class IV employee of regular establishment and provide him all the service benefits accordingly expeditiously or within the time stipulated by this Hon'ble Court. (b) To issue a writ, order or direction in the nature of mandamus commanding and directing the Opp. parties to consider and decide the application of the petitioner submitted by him on 20.03.2025 with speaking and reasoned order expeditiously or within the time stipulated by this Hon'ble Court. (c) To award the cost of the petition in favour of the petitioner. (d) To issue any other writ, order or direction in the nature and manner which this Hon'ble Court deems fit and proper in the circumstances of the case." After arguing at length, learned counsel for the petitioner submits that the interest of justice would be sub-served if this Hon'ble Court may be pleased to give liberty to the petitioner to move a fresh representation before the respondent no. 2 and he may be directed to consider & decide the same, within stipulated period of time as may be fixed by this Court. Learned counsel for the opposite parties have no objection to the contention aforesaid. Versus Counsel for Petitioner(s) : Savita Jain, Jyoti Kumari Counsel for Respondent(s) : Rishabh Kapoor Mahku .....Petitioner(s) U.P. Jal Nigam (Rural ) Thru. Managing Director Lko. And 2 Others .....Respondent(s) Be that as it may, without entering into the merit of the case, the petitioner is permitted to move a fresh representation within period of 15 days, and if such representation is moved within aforesaid period, the respondent no. 2/Chief Engineer(E-4), U.P. Jal Nigam(Rural), 6-Rana Pratap Marg, Lucknow is hereby directed to consider and decide the same, within a period of six weeks, in accordance with law, from the date, a certified copy of this order is produced before him. With the aforesaid observations, the instant petition is disposed of. November 19, 2025 Mayank WRIA No. 13335 of 2025 2 (Shree Prakash Singh,J.) Digitally signed by :- MAYANK PRATAP SINGH High Court of Judicature at Allahabad, Lucknow Bench