HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT ALLAHABAD LUCKNOW CRIMINAL MISC. BAIL APPLICATION No. - 13364 of 2024 Court No. - 15 HON'BLE KARUNESH SINGH PAWAR, J. Heard learned counsel for the accused-applicant as well as learned A.G.A. for the State and perused the record. None appeared for the complainant. Learned counsel for accused-applicant while pressing the bail application submits the applicant is innocent and has been falsely implicated in the case. Submission of the learned counsel for the applicant is that applicant has no criminal antecedents and has been in jail since 24.09.2024. All seven injured persons have sustained simple injuries. There are general allegations levelled in the prosecution case. There is no specific allegation as to who snatched the gold chain. During investigation, Section 394 IPC has been dropped by the Investigating Officer and the charge sheet in the case has been filed. It is submitted that the co-accused Susheel Kumar Mishra @ Sunil Mishra and Amar Nath Trivedi, have already been enlarged on bail by this Court. The bail orders are on record as Annexure No. 6 to the bail application. Applicant seeks parity with the bail orders of the aforesaid co-accused. It is lastly contended that there is no possibility of the applicant of fleeing away from the judicial process or tampering with the witnesses and in case, the applicant is enlarged on bail, the applicant shall not misuse the liberty of bail. Learned A.G.A. has opposed the prayer for bail but has not disputed the Versus Counsel for Applicant(s) : Ravi Awasthi, Bhoomika Bajpai, Chandra Bhanu Singh, Deepranjan Pandey Counsel for Opposite Party(s) : G.A. Madan Lal Trivedi .....Applicant(s) State Of U.P. Thru. Prin. Secy. Home Deptt. U.P. Lko. And 3 Others .....Opposite Party(s) factual submissions made by the learned counsel for the accused-applicant. He submits that all the injured persons sustained simple injuries. On due consideration of aforesaid, including the facts that the applicant is languishing in jail since 24.09.2024, the role assigned to the him, bail orders of the co-accused, named above and the period of incarceration undergone by the applicant, I find it to be a fit case for enlarging the applicant on bail on the ground of parity. Accordingly, the bail application is allowed on the ground of parity. Let the applicant- Madan Lal Trivedi, involved in Case Crime/FIR No. 0779 of 2016, under Section 147, 323, 354, 504, 506 IPC, & 3(1)XI of SC/ST Act and 7/8 POCSO Act, Police Station-Gomti Nagar, District- Lucknow, be released on bail on furnishing a personal bond and two sureties each in the like amount to the satisfaction of Magistrate/Court concerned, subject to following conditions:- (i) the applicant shall not tamper with the prosecution evidence; (ii) the applicant shall not pressurize the prosecution witnesses; (iii) the applicant shall appear on each and every date fixed by the trial Court. Any other condition(s) which the trial court/concerned court may deem fit and proper, in the circumstances of the case, may also be imposed. It is clarified that the observations made in this order are confined to the present bail application and shall have no bearing on the merits of the trial. December 10, 2025 Vinay/- BAIL No. 13364 of 2024 2 (Karunesh Singh Pawar,J.) Digitally signed by :- VINAY KUMAR High Court of Judicature at Allahabad, Lucknow Bench Digitally signed by :- VINAY KUMAR High Court of Judicature at Allahabad, Lucknow Bench