JAGDISH S/O SH. BHOORARAM v. KAJODMAL BAIRWA S/O MOTIRAM
CW/7904/2025 · 2025-05-22
Vinod Kumar Bharwani
body2025
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 18546 (RAJ) · dailylaw.ai ]
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 18546 (RAJ) · dailylaw.ai ]
Judgment text
Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.
[2025:RJ-JP:21557] HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE FOR RAJASTHAN BENCH AT JAIPUR S.B. Civil Writ Petition No. 7904/2025
1. Jagdish S/o Sh. Bhooraram, Resident Of Bairwo Ka Bas, Kapoorwala, Tehsil Sanganer, District Jaipur, Rajasthan.
2. Dhannalal S/o Jagdish, Resident Of Bairwo Ka Bas, Kapoorwala, Tehsil Sanganer, District Jaipur, Rajasthan.
3. Ratanlal S/o Jagdish, Resident Of Bairwo Ka Bas, Kapoorwala, Tehsil Sanganer, District Jaipur, Rajasthan.
4. Dilip S/o Dhannalal, Resident Of Bairwo Ka Bas, Kapoorwala, Tehsil Sanganer, District Jaipur, Rajasthan. ----Petitioners Versus Kajodmal Bairwa S/o Motiram, Resident Of Bairwo Ka Bas, Kapoorwala, Tehsil Sanganer, District Jaipur, Rajasthan. ----Respondent For Petitioner(s) : Mr. Mukesh Pal Jadoun For Respondent(s) :
HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE VINOD KUMAR BHARWANI Order 22/05/2025
1. The present civil writ petition has been filed by the petitioners against the order dated 08.04.2025 passed by the Court of learned Additional District Judge No.10, Jaipur Metropolitan-I, Jaipur (Headquarter Sanganer), in Civil Suit No.26/2025 titled as Kajodmal Bairwa v. Jagdish & Ors., whereby the appeal filed by the respondent was allowed and the order dated 27.03.2025 passed by the Court of learned Additional Civil Judge No.18, Jaipur Metropolitan-I, Jaipur, in Civil Misc. Application No.173/2025, was set aside while directing the parties
[2025:RJ-JP:21557] (2 of 2) [CW-7904/2025] to maintain status-quo with regard to the disputed property till disposal of the original T.I. application.
2. After arguing to some extent, learned counsel for the petitioners makes only a limited prayer that the learned Trial Court may be directed to decide the original T.I. application pending in the matter as expeditiously as possible.
3. Heard. Perused.
4. After going through the impugned orders dated 08.04.2025 & 27.03.2025 passed by the learned Court(s) below, it is clearly evident that the original Temporary Injunction Application is still pending in the matter.
5. Considering the submissions made by learned counsel for the petitioners made at bar, learned Trial Court is directed to decide the original Temporary Injunction Application No.173/2025 titled as Kajodmal Bairwa v. Jagdish & Ors., within a period of two months from the date of receipt of copy of this order in accordance with law.
6. In view of the aforesaid directions, the present civil writ petition stands disposed of.
7. Pending application(s), if any, also stands disposed of.
8. Office is directed to supply a copy of this order to the learned Trial Court for further information & necessary compliance.
(VINOD KUMAR BHARWANI),J SAHIL SONI /19