SAROJINI DEVI v. U.O.I. THRU. DEPUTY SECY. LANDS DEPTT. OF DEFENCE NEW DELHI AND 2 OTHERS
WRIC/11753/2025 · 2025-12-17
Manjive Shukla, Shekhar B Saraf
body2025
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 185455 (ALL) · dailylaw.ai ]
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 185455 (ALL) · dailylaw.ai ]
Judgment text
Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.
HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT ALLAHABAD LUCKNOW WRIT - C No. - 11753 of 2025 Court No. - 3 HON'BLE SHEKHAR B. SARAF, J.
HON'BLE MANJIVE SHUKLA, J.
1. Heard learned counsel appearing on behalf of the petitioner and Shri S.B. Pandey, learned Senior Advocate & DSGI assisted by Shri Raj Kumar Singh for opposite party Nos.1 to 3.
2. Learned counsel appearing on behalf of the petitioner, upon reconsideration, has sought liberty to withdraw this writ petition with leave to file an application before the appropriate authority for demarcation of his land.
3. Upon hearing learned counsel appearing on behalf of both the parties, we dispose of the writ petition with liberty granted to the petitioner to approach the appropriate authority for demarcation of his land. If such an application is made before the appropriate authority within a period of two weeks from date, the appropriate authority is directed to grant an opportunity of hearing to the petitioner and respondent Nos.2 & 3, and thereafter, pass a reasoned order in accordance with law within a period of 8 weeks from the date of filing the said application. December 17, 2025 Ashutosh Versus Counsel for Petitioner(s) : Shailesh Sachan, Gaurav Singh, Sachin Kumar Counsel for Respondent(s) : A.S.G.I. (Manjive Shukla,J.) (Shekhar B. Saraf,J.) Sarojini Devi .....Petitioner(s) U.O.I. Thru. Deputy Secy. Lands Deptt. Of Defence New Delhi And 2 Others .....Respondent(s) Digitally signed by :- ASHUTOSH PANDEY High Court of Judicature at Allahabad, Lucknow Bench