MAHENDRA KUMAR v. STATE OF U.P. THRU PRIN.SECY.GRAM VIKAS GOVT.OF UP and ORS.
WRIA/16291/2016 · 2025-11-26
body2025
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 185448 (ALL) · dailylaw.ai ]
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 185448 (ALL) · dailylaw.ai ]
Judgment text
Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.
HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT ALLAHABAD LUCKNOW WRIT - A No. - 16291 of 2016 Court No. - 18 HON'BLE SHREE PRAKASH SINGH, J.
1. Case called out.
2. None is present for the petitioner to press this writ petition.
3. Learned counsel for the State is present.
4. The writ petition is dismissed for want of prosecution.
5. Interim order, if any, stands vacated.
6. Consigned to records. November 26, 2025 Mayank Versus Counsel for Petitioner(s) : Hanumant Lal Yadav, Vidya Bhushan Pandey Counsel for Respondent(s) : C.S.C. (Shree Prakash Singh,J.) Mahendra Kumar .....Petitioner(s) State Of U.P. Thru Prin.Secy.Gram Vikas Govt.Of Up And Ors. .....Respondent(s) Digitally signed by :- MAYANK PRATAP SINGH High Court of Judicature at Allahabad, Lucknow Bench