Research › Search › Judgment

Allahabad High Court · body

2025 DAILYLAW 185438 (ALL)

SAHABRAJ @ SAHAB RAJ YADAV v. ADDL. COMMISSIONER ADMINISTRATION, AYODHYA MANDAL, AYODHYA AND OTHERS

/7100/2025 · 2025-12-09

Alok Mathur

body2025

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT ALLAHABAD LUCKNOW MATTERS UNDER ARTICLE 227 No. - 7100 of 2025 Court No. - 5 HON'BLE ALOK MATHUR, J. 1. Heard learned counsel for the petitioner, learned Standing counsel for the State respondents and Sri Mohan Singh for the Land Management Committee. 2. In view of the proposed order notice to private respondents is dispensed with. 3. Present petition under Article 227 of the Constitution has been filed with following prayer:- "issue a direction to the opposite party No.1 i.e. Additional Commissioner (Administration), Ayodhya Mandal, Ayodhya to decide the stay application dated 30.6.2025 filed by the petitioner in Revision No.1871 of 2025 under section 210 of U.P. Revenue Code "Sahabraj Versus Kismatti & others", pending since 30.6.2025, expeditiously within stipulated period as early as possible" 3. It has been submitted on behalf of the petitioner that in the aforesaid revision no interim order has been passed on the application for interim relief while on the other hand interference is being caused by the respondents on the disputed property for which there is requirement for expeditious disposal of the interim relief application. He further submits that the respondents have been served. 4. Learned State counsel does not oppose the aforesaid prayer. 5. Accordingly, considering the aforesaid submissions the petition is disposed of with a direction to respondent No.1 to consider and decided the application for interim relief with expedition, say within six weeks from the date service has been effected on the respondents, in case there is Versus Counsel for Petitioner(s) : Ram Singh Counsel for Respondent(s) : C.S.C., Mohan Singh Sahabraj @ Sahab Raj Yadav .....Petitioner(s) Addl. Commissioner Administration, Ayodhya Mandal, Ayodhya And Others .....Respondent(s) no legal impediment. 6. In case, it is not possible to decide the same within the time prescribed above, he shall decide the same within two weeks thereafter. 7. It is further provided that in case it is not possible to decide the application for interim relief the respondent No.1 shall consider passing ad interim injunction if a case is so made out. December 9, 2025 RKM. A227 No. 7100 of 2025 2 (Alok Mathur,J.) Digitally signed by :- RAKESH KUMAR MAURYA High Court of Judicature at Allahabad, Lucknow Bench