RAJ KUMAR v. BANK OF BARODA THRU. ITS REGIONAL BRANCH MANAGER DISTT. AYODHYA AND 2 OTHERS
WRIC/10430/2025 · 2025-11-14
Prashant Kumar, Shekhar B Saraf
body2025
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 185434 (ALL) · dailylaw.ai ]
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 185434 (ALL) · dailylaw.ai ]
Judgment text
Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.
HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT ALLAHABAD LUCKNOW WRIT - C No. - 10430 of 2025 Court No. - 3 HON'BLE SHEKHAR B. SARAF, J.
HON'BLE PRASHANT KUMAR, J.
1. Heard learned counsel for the parties.
2. Learned counsel for the petitioner prays to withdraw the present writ petition with liberty to the petitioner to file fresh writ petition with better particulars for the same cause of action.
3. Learned Standing Counsel has no objection to the same.
4. With the aforesaid liberty, the writ petition is dismissed as withdrawn. November 14, 2025 Anupam S/- Versus Counsel for Petitioner(s) : Dinesh Kumar Tiwari, Prabhakar Pandey Counsel for Respondent(s) : Prashant Kumar Srivastava (Prashant Kumar,J.) (Shekhar B. Saraf,J.) Raj Kumar .....Petitioner(s) Bank Of Baroda Thru. Its Regional Branch Manager Distt. Ayodhya And 2 Others .....Respondent(s) Digitally signed by :- ANUPAM SINGH PATEL High Court of Judicature at Allahabad, Lucknow Bench