KRISHNDEV v. CONSOLIDATION OFFICER, TEHSIL BIKAPUR, AYODHYA AND ANOTHER
A227/7269/2025 · 2025-12-17
Alok Mathur
body2025
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 185426 (ALL) · dailylaw.ai ]
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 185426 (ALL) · dailylaw.ai ]
Judgment text
Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.
HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT ALLAHABAD LUCKNOW MATTERS UNDER ARTICLE 227 No. - 7269 of 2025 Court No. - 5 HON'BLE ALOK MATHUR, J.
1. Heard learned counsel for the petitioner as well as learned Standing Counsel for the State respondent.
2. In view of the proposed order notice to private respondent is dispensed with.
3. Instant petition has been filed by the petitioner praying for direction to respondent No.1- Consolidation Officer, Tehsil Bikapur, District Ayodhya to decide case No.174/2007, computerized case No.2007550423030011 (Krishadev Vs. Shankar) under Section 9 (1) of C.H. Act, expeditiously.
4. Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that grievance of the petitioner would be sufficiently met in case respondent no. 1 considers and decides the aforesaid case in the time bound manner.
5. Learned Standing Counsel has no objection to the aforesaid prayer.
6. Considering the facts and circumstances of the case, without entering into the merits, respondent no.1 - Consolidation Officer, Tehsil Bikapur, District Ayodhya is directed to decide case No.174/2007, computerized case No.2007550423030011 (Krishadev Vs. Shankar) under Section 9 (1) of C.H. Act, expeditiously, say within a period of six months from the date of production of certified copy of this order, after affording opportunity of hearing to the parties concerned in accordance with law, if there is no legal impediment.
7. It is further directed that the parties to the case shall cooperate in expeditious disposal of the case and shall not seek any unnecessary adjournment, neither any such adjournment shall be granted by the Court concerned, except in exceptional circumstances. Counsel for the petitioner undertakes that he shall cooperate in expeditious disposal of the case, failing which the benefit of this order shall not be available to the petitioner.
8. With above observations/directions, the writ petition stands disposed of. December 17, 2025 RKM. Versus Counsel for Petitioner(s) : Vishnu Pratap Singh, Shivanshi Mishra Counsel for Respondent(s) : C.S.C. (Alok Mathur,J.) Krishndev .....Petitioner(s) Consolidation Officer, Tehsil Bikapur, Ayodhya And Another .....Respondent(s) Digitally signed by :- RAKESH KUMAR MAURYA High Court of Judicature at Allahabad, Lucknow Bench Digitally signed by :- RAKESH KUMAR MAURYA High Court of Judicature at Allahabad, Lucknow Bench