SUMIT KUMAR YADAV v. STATE OF U.P. THRU. PRIN. SECY. HOME AND OTHERS
CRLP/2157/2024 · 2025-10-31
Rajnish Kumar, Zafeer Ahmad
body2025
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 185422 (ALL) · dailylaw.ai ]
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 185422 (ALL) · dailylaw.ai ]
Judgment text
Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.
HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT ALLAHABAD LUCKNOW CRIMINAL MISC. WRIT PETITION No. - 2157 of 2024 Court No. - 10 HON'BLE RAJNISH KUMAR, J.
HON'BLE ZAFEER AHMAD, J.
1. Heard Sri Anurag Singh, learned counsel for the petitioner and learned AGA for the State. 2. This Court passed the following order on 29.3.2024:
"By means of this petition, the petitioner has sought quashing of F.I.R. dated 12.03.2024 bearing Case Crime/FIR No.0085/2024, for the offence under Sections 304, 504, 506, 308 I.P.C. and Section 3(2)(v) SC/ST Act, registered at Police Station Kotwali, District Sitapur. Submission of the petitioner's counsel is that the deceased was working as a labourer at the site where the house of the petitioner was under construction and suffered injuries as a result of a fall and died, application was filed alleging an offence for the first time, three months after the incident on 04.01.2024, whereas, the incident took place on 24.10.2023. An enquiry was conducted by the Circle Officer wherein, it was found that no offence has been committed. A copy of enquiry report is annexed at page no. 34 of the writ petition. Moreover, the inquest report bears the sign of the father of the deceased and nothing was found amiss in the said report also, but only on the tutoring of some persons and with ulterior motive to extract money, the impugned FIR has been lodged. Issue notice to opposite party No.5. Let the pleadings be exchanged within eight weeks. List thereafter. Considering the submission made, the it is provided that the petitioner shall not be arrested on the basis of the impugned First Information Report, unless and until there is sufficient and cogent evidence available against him regarding commission of the offence. He shall get his statement recorded before the Police as and when he is called. If he does not do so, then it can be made a ground for seeking vacation of this interim order." Versus Counsel for Petitioner(s) : Anurag Singh Counsel for Respondent(s) : G.A. Sumit Kumar Yadav .....Petitioner(s) State Of U.P. Thru. Prin. Secy. Home And Others .....Respondent(s)
3.
Learned AGA on the basis of instructions dated 27.10.2025 received from Incharge Inspector, Police Station Kotwali Nagar, District Sitapur, a copy of which has been produced before this Court and is placed on record, submits that final report dated B-25/2024 dated 13.4.2024 has been filed in the court of Special Judge, Police Station Kotwali Nagar, District Sitapur, in which next date fixed is 12.11.2025, therefore, this petition has lost its efficacy. 4. Dismissed accordingly. October 31, 2025 Fahim/- CRLP No. 2157 of 2024 2 (Zafeer Ahmad,J.) (Rajnish Kumar,J.) Digitally signed by :- MOHD FAHIM AKHTAR High Court of Judicature at Allahabad, Lucknow Bench