HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT ALLAHABAD LUCKNOW APPLICATION U/S 482 No. - 8589 of 2022 Court No. - 14 HON'BLE RAJEEV SINGH, J. 1. Heard learned counsel for the parties. 2. The instant application has been filed with the following prayer:- "To quash the impugned charge-sheet vide Sessions Case No. 187/2022 (the State versus Raghuvansh Mani Rastogi and another) arising out of FIR/Crime No. 03/2017, under Sections 504, 285, 338 I.P.C. and Section 3(1)(x) of the Scheduled Castes and the Scheduled Tribes (Prevention of Afrocities) Act, 1989, relating to the P.S.- Sarojini Nagar, Lucknow and the impugned cognizance order dated 29.01.2022 passed against the applicant under Section 504 I.P.C. and Section 3(1)(x) of the Scheduled Castes and the Scheduled Tribes (Prevention of Atrocities) Act, 1989, alongwith all its consequential proceedings pending in the Court of Special Judge, Scheduled Castes and the Scheduled Tribes (Prevention of Atrocities) Act, Lucknow." 3. Learned counsel for the applicant submits that both the parties have amicably compromised their dispute. The compromise, which has been taken place between the parties, is also filed before this Court as Annexure No. S.A.-1 of the supplementary affidavit dated 03.11.2025. 4. Whether the parties have, in fact, compromised the matter or not, can best be ascertained by the trial court concerned as such compromise has to be duly verified in presence of the parties concerned before the Court. Versus Counsel for Applicant(s) : Arun Sinha, Abhishek Pratap, Aniket Raj, Pranshu Agrawal, Ram Chandra Singh, Siddhartha Sinha Counsel for Opposite Party(s) : G.A., Chandra Shekhar Singh Yadav Raghuvansh Mani Rastogi .....Applicant(s) State Of U.P. Thru. Addl. Chief Secy. Home Lko And Another .....Opposite Party(s) 5. Accordingly, this application is disposed of with a direction to the trial court concerned that if any such compromise is filed before it, it shall issue notices to all the signatories to the compromise requiring their personal presence and, thereafter, proceed to verify the compromise. If the aforesaid compromise is verified, a report to that effect shall be prepared by the court and the compromise will be made part of the record. 6. The court concerned in that scenario will allow the parties to obtain certified copy of the report as well as compromise and it will be open to the applicant to approach this Court again for quashing of the proceedings. 7. For a period of one month, no coercive action shall be taken against the applicant in the aforesaid case. 8. Office is directed to return the original compromise deed, if any, to the learned counsel for the applicant, after taking the photocopy of the same. November 17, 2025 Arpan A482 No. 8589 of 2022 2 (Rajeev Singh,J.) Digitally signed by :- ARPAN High Court of Judicature at Allahabad, Lucknow Bench