1 / 3 2025:CGHC:19795 NAFR HIGH COURT OF CHHATTISGARH AT BILASPUR CONT No. 625 of 2025 1 - Uday Kumar Ram S/o Shri Ramchandra Ram Aged About 37 Years R/o Village - Mangarhara, P.S. And Tahsil - Balrampur, Distt. Balrampur- Ramanujganj (C.G.) 2 - Shrikant Singh S/o Motilal Singh Aged About 34 Years R/o Village - Amdanda, P.S. And Tahsil - Balrampur, Distt. Balrampur-Ramanujganj (C.G.) 3 - Gyani Singh S/o Jattu Singh Aged About 51 Years R/o Village - Amdanda, P.S. And Tahsil - Balrampur, Distt. Balrampur-Ramanujganj (C.G.) 4 - Shyamdeep Singh S/o Maninath Aged About 54 Years R/o Village - Amdanda, P.S. And Tahsil - Balrampur, Distt. Balrampur-Ramanujganj (C.G.) 5 - Triveni Singh S/o Late Bipat Singh Aged About 51 Years R/o Village - Amdanda, P.S. And Tahsil - Balrampur, Distt. Balrampur-Ramanujganj (C.G.) 6 - Parsuram Singh S/o Ishwar Singh Aged About 68 Years R/o Village - Jabar, P.S. And Tahsil - Balrampur, Distt. Balrampur-Ramanujganj (C.G.) SOURABH BHILWAR Digitally signed by SOURABH BHILWAR Date: 2025.05.01 18:47:18 +0530 2 / 3 7 - Binu Singh S/o Vikrama Singh Aged About 59 Years R/o Village - Mangarhara, P.S. And Tahsil - Balrampur, Distt. Balrampur-Ramanujganj (C.G.) ... Petitioner(s) versus 1 - Gautam Rahul Rai Deputy Chief Engineer (Construction), South Eastern Central Railway Sahdol, Distt. - Sahdol (M.P.), (Contemnors) 2 - Anand Ram Netam Sub Divisional Officer (Revenue) / Land Acquisition Officer - Balrampur, Distt. Balrampur-Ramanujganj (C.G.) 3 - Ramraj Singh Tahsildar - Balrampur, Distt. Balrampur-Ramanujganj (C.G.) 4 - Ravi Kumar Bhojwani Nayab Tahsildar - Balrampur, Distt. Balrampur- Ramanujganj (C.G.) ... Respondents (Cause title is taken from Case Information System) For Petitioners : Mr. A. N. Pandey, Advocate through VC (HON’BLE SHRI JUSTICE BIBHU DATTA GURU) Order on Board 01/05/2025 1. The present contempt petition has been filed by the petitioner for non-compliance of the order dated 21/03/2024 passed by this Court in WPC No.1658/2024. 2. Learned counsel appearing for the petitioners submits that the respondent authorities/ Contemnors are not deciding the pending representation filed by the petitioners though there was a direction of this Court vide order dated 21/03/2024 passed in WPC No.1658/2024 and the same is not being complied with till date. 3 / 3 3. I have heard learned counsel for the petitioners and perused the order passed by this Court as well as the representations submitted by the petitioners. 4. From perusal of the order dated 21/03/2024, it appears that the writ petition was disposed of with a direction to the concerned authorities to consider the representations of the petitioners expeditiously, whereas, there is no time limit framed by this Court. Hence, at this stage, it cannot be said that the respondents are defying the order passed by this Court in WPC No. 1658/2024. 5. In view of the above, no contempt proceeding can be drawn and the contempt petition is not maintainable, at this juncture. 6. The petitioner is at liberty to apprise the respondent authorities with regard to the order passed by this Court by reminding them about the observation made by this Court in WPC No. 1658/2024 vide order dated 21.03.2024. 7. With the aforesaid observation, the contempt petition is disposed of. Sd/- (BIBHU DATTA GURU) Judge $. Bhilwar