Research › Search › Judgment

Patna High Court · body

2025 DAILYLAW 18541 (PAT)

Pawan Kumar Singh @ Pawan Singh v. The State of Bihar

CR. APP (SJ)/743/2024 · 2025-02-13

Rajiv Roy

Criminal Appealbody2025

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA CRIMINAL APPEAL (SJ) No.743 of 2024 Arising Out of PS. Case No.-10 Year-2017 Thana- SC/ST District- Lakhisarai ====================================================== 1. Pawan Kumar Singh @ Pawan Singh S/o Late Markandey Singh R/o vill - Jainagar, Lali Pahari, ward no. 33, P.S. - Kabaiya, Distt. - Lakhisarai 2. Mamta Kumari W/o Pawan Kumar Singh @ Pawan Singh R/o vill - Jainagar, Lali Pahari, ward no. 33, P.S. - Kabaiya, Distt. - Lakhisarai 3. Pampam Kumar @ Pampam Kumar Singh S/o Pawan Kumar Singh @ Pawan Singh R/o vill - Jainagar, Lali Pahari, ward no. 33, P.S. - Kabaiya, Distt. - Lakhisarai 4. Brajesh Saw @ Bablu Sao S/o Bishwanath Sao @ Janeuwa Sao R/o vill - Jainagar, Lali Pahari, ward no. 33, P.S. - Kabaiya, Distt. - Lakhisarai ... ... Appellant/s Versus 1. The State of Bihar 2. Basudeo Das S/o Late Jagarnath Das R/o vill - Jainagar, Lali Pahari, ward no. 33, P.S. - Kabaiya, Distt. - Lakhisarai ... ... Respondent/s ====================================================== Appearance : For the Appellant/s : Mr.Parmanand Pd. Nr. Sahi, Advocate For the Respondent/s : Mr.Sadanand Paswan, Spl. P.P. ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE RAJIV ROY ORAL ORDER 6 13-02-2025 Heard the parties. 2. The present Memo of Appeal has been preferred for quashing the order dated 24.11.2017 by which the learned Special Judge cum Addl. Sessions Judge 1", Lakhisaral was pleased to take cognizance under Sections 341, 448, 323, 504, 506/34 I.P.C. and Sections 3(1)(r) (2) (VA) of SC/St Act, against these appellants in Lakhisarai SC/ST P.S. Case No. 10/2017, Patna High Court CR. APP (SJ) No.743 of 2024(6) dt.13-02-2025 2/2 computer (SC/ST) Registration No. 21/2017, Sl. No. 85/17. 3. After some argument, learned counsel for the appellants prays that he for the present wants to withdraw the petition to take the remedial measure. 4. Accordingly, both the present appeal as also the Interlocutory Application stand dismissed as withdrawn. Ravi/- (Rajiv Roy, J) U T