Research › Search › Judgment

Allahabad High Court · body

2025 DAILYLAW 18541 (ALL)

RAJ KUMAR v. STATE OF U.P. AND ANOTHER

WRIA/1929/2025 · 2025-02-16

Ajay Bhanot

body2025

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

Neutral Citation No. - 2025:AHC:22083 Court No. - 5 Case :- WRIT - A No. - 1929 of 2025 Petitioner :- Raj Kumar Respondent :- State of U.P. and Another Counsel for Petitioner :- Parvat Singh Counsel for Respondent :- C.S.C.,Harshit Pandey Hon'ble Ajay Bhanot,J. Heard Shri Parvat Singh, learned counsel for the petitioner, learned Standing Counsel for the respondent No.1-State and Shri Harshit Pandey, learned counsel for the respondent No.2. The petitioner is serving as Class IV employee in the Nagar Nigam Kanpur. He claims that he is entitled to the benefit of Assured Career Progression (A.C.P.). He has made a representation in this regard but to no avail. Learned Standing Counsel for the respondent No.1-State and Shri Harshit Pandey, learned counsel for the respondent No.2 submit that the matter requires determination of facts by the competent authority as per law in the first instance. However, they fairly contend that his service benefit is liable to be decided by the competent authority in a reasonable time frame. In light of the aforesaid submissions and without going into the merits of the case, the respondent No.2-Nagar Ayukta, Nagar Nigam Kanpur Nagar shall decide the representation of the petitioner regarding grant of Assured Career Progression (A.C.P.) as per law within a period of three months from the date of receipt of a certified copy of this order along with a fresh copy of the representation. With the aforesaid direction, the writ petition is finally disposed of. Order Date :- 17.2.2025 Ashish Tripathi Digitally signed by :- ASHISH NAYAN TRIPATHI High Court of Judicature at Allahabad Digitally signed by :- ASHISH NAYAN TRIPATHI High Court of Judicature at Allahabad