ANIL v. STATE OF U.P. THRU. PRIN. SECY. HOME LKO. AND 3 OTHERS
BAIL/9223/2025 · 2025-11-13
Pankaj Bhatia
body2025
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 185400 (ALL) · dailylaw.ai ]
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 185400 (ALL) · dailylaw.ai ]
Judgment text
Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.
HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT ALLAHABAD LUCKNOW CRIMINAL MISC. BAIL APPLICATION No. - 9223 of 2025 Court No. - 12 HON'BLE PANKAJ BHATIA, J.
1. Counter affidavit filed today is taken on record. 2. Heard learned counsel for the applicant, learned AGA and perused the record. 3. The applicant seeks enlargement on bail in FIR No. 184 of 2024, under sections 65(2), 74, 76, 351(3) BNS, Sections 5(m)/6 POCSO Act, P.S. Fatehpur Chaurasi, District Unnao. 4. Learned counsel for the applicant argues that in terms of FIR it was alleged that daughter of the informant aged about 15 years had gone out of home when the applicant caught her and misbehaved with her and touched her inappropriately. No allegations of rape was levelled. Subsequently in the statement under Section 180 and 183 BNSS also the victim did not alleged commission of rape. However later on a fresh statement was given on 8.7.2025 in which allegations of rape was given whereas the FIR was lodged alleging commission of offence on
19.5.2025. 5. Learned AGA has opposed the bail application. 6. Considering the inordinate delay in fresh allegations and no materiel to corroborate the allegation, however, without commenting upon the merits of the case, the applicant who is in jail since 8.7.2025 and has no criminal Versus Counsel for Applicant(s) : Ashish Shukla, O.P. Tiwari Counsel for Opposite Party(s) : G.A., Mohd. Shahid Chaudhary, Ram Pratap Singh, Sanjeev Trivedi Anil .....Applicant(s) State Of U.P. Thru. Prin. Secy. Home Lko. And 3 Others .....Opposite Party(s)
history is entitled to be enlarged on bail. In view thereof, the application is allowed. 7. Let the applicant Anil be released on bail in aforesaid FIR number on his furnishing a personal bond with two sureties of Rs.20,000/- each to the satisfaction of court concerned with the following conditions: (a) The applicant shall execute a bond to undertake to attend the hearings; (b) The applicant shall not commit any offence similar to the offence of which he is accused or suspected of the commission; and (c) The applicant shall not directly or indirectly make any inducement, threat or promise to any person acquainted with the facts of the case so as to dissuade him from disclosing such facts to the Court or to any police officer or tamper with the evidence.
November 13, 2025 J. K. Dinkar BAIL No. 9223 of 2025 2 (Pankaj Bhatia,J.) Digitally signed by :- JESHU KUMAR DINKAR High Court of Judicature at Allahabad, Lucknow Bench