Page No.# 1/3 GAHC010195852025 2025:GAU-AS:12746 THE GAUHATI HIGH COURT (HIGH COURT OF ASSAM, NAGALAND, MIZORAM AND ARUNACHAL PRADESH) Case No. : Bail Appln./2903/2025 AJMAT ALI @ AJAMAT ALI, S/O HASEN ALI, R/O VILL. NA PARA PAM, P.S. SIALMARI, DIST. NALBARI, ASSAM. VERSUS THE STATE OF ASSAM REPRESENTED BY PP, ASSAM. Advocate for the Petitioner : MR. J A AHMED, MR. K M HASSAN Advocate for the Respondent : PP, ASSAM, BEFORE HONOURABLE MRS. JUSTICE MITALI THAKURIA ORDER Date : 17-09-2025 Heard Mr. K.M. Hassan, the learned counsel for the petitioner and also heard Mr. K. Baishya, the learned Additional Public Prosecutor appearing on behalf of the State respondent. 2. This is an application under Section 483 of the Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Page No.# 2/3 Sanhita, 2023, with prayer for bail as the petitioner is behind bars since 27.06.2025 in connection with Sialmari P.S. Case No. 15/2025 u/s 103/191(3)/191(2)/190/118(1)/118(2) of BNS, 2023 [corresponding to G.R. Case No. 505/2025]. 3. Case Diary received. Perused the same. 4. It is submitted by Mr. Hassan, the learned counsel for the petitioner that the present accused/petitioner is not at all involved in the alleged offence and at the time of incident he was playing carrom. When he heard noise in the house of Sukkur Ali, he being a VDP member went there. It is fact that at the time of the incident he had not committed any such offence as alleged in the FIR. Further, he submitted that he is in custody for last 83 days. Considering his period of detention the prayer of the petitioner may also be considered. However, he is ready and willing to co-operate with the Investigating Officer regarding further investigation of this case. 5. Mr. K. Baishya, the learned Additional Public Prosecutor submitted in this regard that the witnesses have implicated the present petitioner also showing his involvement in the alleged offence. However, it is a fact that the case is still under investigation and the petitioner is in custody since last 83 days. 6. Considering the submissions made learned counsel for both sides and without going detail into the merit of the case, only considering the length of detention already undergone by the accused/petitioner, this Court is of the opinion that I/O has got sufficient time for his custodial interrogation and hence further custodial detention may not be required for the purpose of investigation. Accordingly, I find it is a fit case to enlarge the accused/petitioner on bail. 7. Accordingly, the accused/petitioner is released on bail on furnishing a bond Page No.# 3/3 of Rs. 20,000/- (Rupees twenty thousand) only with one surety of like amount to the satisfaction of the learned CJM, Nalbari. The accused/petitioner, namely Ajmat Ali @ Ajamat Ali be enlarged on bail, subject to the following conditions:- (i) that the petitioner shall make himself available for interrogation by the Investigating Officer as and when required; (ii) that the petitioner shall not, directly or indirectly, make any inducement, threaten or promise to any person acquainted with the facts of the case so as to dissuade him/them from disclosing such facts to the Court or to any police officer; and (iii) that the petitioner shall not leave the jurisdiction of the learned CJM, Nalbari without prior permission. The Bail Application stands disposed of. JUDGE Comparing Assistant