Research › Search › Judgment

Allahabad High Court · body

2025 DAILYLAW 185386 (ALL)

ANKIT PASI v. STATE OF U.P. THRU. PRIN. SECY. HOME LKO.

BAIL/5473/2025 · 2025-12-11

Pankaj Bhatia

body2025

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT ALLAHABAD LUCKNOW CRIMINAL MISC. BAIL APPLICATION No. - 5473 of 2025 Court No. - 12 HON'BLE PANKAJ BHATIA, J. 1. Heard learned counsel for the applicant, learned AGA for the State, Shri Gaurav Nigam, learned counsel for the informant and perused the record. 2. The applicant seeks enlargement on bail in FIR No.349 of 2024, under sections 103(1) BNS, P.S. Harpalpur, District Hardoi. 3. Learned counsel for the applicant argues that in terms of FIR it was alleged that around 4 years ago father of the informant aged about 65 years had some dispute with the applicant aged about 20 years in which the applicant had suffered certain injuries and on 29.11.2024 on account of said dispute the father of the informant who was keeping in agricultural fields was attacked by the applicant and was killed. Cause of death as per post mortem report are crushed and lacerated wound present over face and skull. In the light of the said allegations the submission of learned counsel for the applicant is that there are no eye witness to the incident. The motive as alleged in the FIR is very weak motive as the earlier incident had taken place around four years ago. 4. Learned AGA has opposed the bail application. 5. Considering the fact that there is no eye witness to the incident and no recovery has been effected from the applicant and the applicant has been linked based upon confessional statement, however, without commenting Versus Counsel for Applicant(s) : Arun Sinha, Gaurav Nigam, Ram Chandra Singh Counsel for Opposite Party(s) : G.A., Gaurav Nigam Ankit Pasi .....Applicant(s) State Of U.P. Thru. Prin. Secy. Home Lko. .....Opposite Party(s) upon the merits of the case, the applicant who is in jail since 1.12.2024 and has no criminal history is entitled to be enlarged on bail. In view thereof, the application is allowed. 6. Let the applicant Ankit Pasi be released on bail in aforesaid FIR number on his furnishing a personal bond with two sureties of Rs.20,000/- each to the satisfaction of court concerned with the following conditions: (a) The applicant shall execute a bond to undertake to attend the hearings; (b) The applicant shall not commit any offence similar to the offence of which he is accused or suspected of the commission; and (c) The applicant shall not directly or indirectly make any inducement, threat or promise to any person acquainted with the facts of the case so as to dissuade him from disclosing such facts to the Court or to any police officer or tamper with the evidence. December 11, 2025 J. K. Dinkar BAIL No. 5473 of 2025 2 (Pankaj Bhatia,J.) Digitally signed by :- JESHU KUMAR DINKAR High Court of Judicature at Allahabad, Lucknow Bench