HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT ALLAHABAD LUCKNOW WRIT - A No. - 21089 of 2017 Court No. - 18 HON'BLE SHREE PRAKASH SINGH, J. 1. Case called out. 2. None is present for the petitioners to press this writ petition. 3. Learned counsel for the State is present. 4. The writ petition is dismissed for want of prosecution. 5. Interim order, if any, stands vacated. 6. Consigned to records. November 6, 2025 Mayank Versus Counsel for Petitioner(s) : Vinay Tripathi, Uma Kant Mishra Counsel for Respondent(s) : A.S.G., Anurag Srivastava (Shree Prakash Singh,J.) Vinod Kumar Sharma And 14 Ors. .....Petitioner(s) U.O.I. Secy.Ministry Of Finance New Delhi And Others .....Respondent(s) Digitally signed by :- MAYANK PRATAP SINGH High Court of Judicature at Allahabad, Lucknow Bench