Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.
Page No.# 1/2 GAHC010195452019
undefined
THE GAUHATI HIGH COURT (HIGH COURT OF ASSAM, NAGALAND, MIZORAM AND ARUNACHAL PRADESH) Case No. : Crl.Rev.P./8/2020 ABHIJIT ROY S/O LATE AMARENDRA ROY, R/O FATASIL AMBARI, A.K. DEB ROAD, NEAR KALIPUR MANDIR, GUWAHATI-25, KAMRUP(M), ASSAM VERSUS THE STATE OF ASSAM AND ANR.
REPRESENTED BY THE PUBLIC PROSECUTOR, ASSAM 2:SUBASH BABAR S/O SRI MARUTI BABAR R/O DANISH ROAD PANBAZAR GUWAHATI-1 DIST-KAMRUP(M) ASSA Advocate for the Petitioner : MR A K RAI, MR. I S MAZUMDAR,MS K GOGOI,MS. N RAI Advocate for the Respondent : PP, ASSAM, MR. R DEV (R-2),MR. T GOGOI (R-2),MR. A BORUA (R-2),MR. P P DUTTA (R-2)
BEFORE HON’BLE MR. JUSTICE KAUSHIK GOSWAMI
07.03.2025
Page No.# 2/2 None appears for the petitioner when called. Heard Mr. R. Dev, learned counsel for the respondent No. 2 and Ms. S.H. Bora, learned Addl. Public Prosecutor for the respondent No. 1. It appears that on the last occasion i.e. 04.03.2025 when the matter was called, there was no representation on behalf of the petitioner and accordingly, the matter was directed to be listed today with the remark “For Dismissal” in the Orders Column. Today, when the matter has been listed with the remark For Dismissal in the cause list, there is again no representation on behalf of the petitioner. That being so, the criminal revision petition stands dismissed for non- prosecution. Send back the Trial Court Record.
JUDGE Comparing Assistant