MOHD. FARHAN v. STATE OF U.P. THRU. PRIN. SECY. HOME LKO
/4133/2025 · 2025-11-27
Pankaj Bhatia
body2025
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 185375 (ALL) · dailylaw.ai ]
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 185375 (ALL) · dailylaw.ai ]
Judgment text
Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.
HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT ALLAHABAD LUCKNOW CRIMINAL MISC. BAIL APPLICATION No. - 4133 of 2025
Court No. - 12 HON'BLE PANKAJ BHATIA, J.
1. Heard learned counsel for the applicant, learned AGA and perused the record. 2. The applicant seeks enlargement on bail in FIR No.104 of 2024, under Section 302 IPC, P.S. Gomti Nagar, District Lucknow. 3. In terms of the FIR it was alleged that sister of the informant had entered into a love marriage with the applicant and a child was also born. Subsequently, she was left alone and thereafter, she had another love marriage with another person and was staying with him and a child was also born. Subsequently, the applicant used to often fight with her and it was stated that on the next date i.e. 08.03.2024 the applicant had throttled his wife to death. Cause of death could not be ascertained in the postmortem report and apart from one contusion injury on the head above the ear, no other injury was observed. 4. Learned AGA has opposed the bail application. 5. Considering the fact that the cause of death could not be ascertained in the postmortem report, the allegations of throttling are not corroborated, as such, the applicant who is in custody since 08.03.2024 and has no criminal antecedents, is entitled to be enlarged on bail. In view thereof, the application is allowed. 6. Let the applicant Mohd. Farhan be released on bail in aforesaid FIR Versus Counsel for Applicant(s) : Eshan Kumar Gupta Counsel for Opposite Party(s) : G.A. Mohd. Farhan .....Applicant(s) State Of U.P. Thru. Prin. Secy. Home Lko .....Opposite Party(s)
number on his furnishing a personal bond with two sureties of Rs.10,000/- each to the satisfaction of court concerned with the following conditions: (a) The applicant shall execute a bond to undertake to attend the hearings; (b) The applicant shall not commit any offence similar to the offence of which he is accused or suspected of the commission; and (c) The applicant shall not directly or indirectly make any inducement, threat or promise to any person acquainted with the facts of the case so as to dissuade him from disclosing such facts to the Court or to any police officer or tamper with the evidence.
November 27, 2025 nishant BAIL No. 4133 of 2025 2 (Pankaj Bhatia,J.) Digitally signed by :- NISHANT MOHAN High Court of Judicature at Allahabad, Lucknow Bench