Page No.# 1/3 GAHC010201922025 undefined THE GAUHATI HIGH COURT (HIGH COURT OF ASSAM, NAGALAND, MIZORAM AND ARUNACHAL PRADESH) Case No. : Bail Appln./2927/2025 RAHUL AMIN SON OF LATE KHALEQUE MIA RESIDENT OF VILL- AGYA PATHAR P.S. SARTHEBARI DIST. BARPETA ASSAM VERSUS THE STATE OF ASSAM REP BY THE PP ASSAM ------------ Advocate for : MR. N J DUTTA Advocate for : PP ASSAM appearing for THE STATE OF ASSAM BEFORE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE PRANJAL DAS ORDER Date : 15.09.2025 Heard Mr. G.P. Chetia, learned counsel for the petitioner. Also heard Mr. P. Page No.# 2/3 Barthakur, learned Additional Public Prosecutor for the State. 2. This application has been filed under section 483 of the Bharatiya Nagarik Suraskha Sanhita, 2023, whereby the accused petitioner namely, Rahul Amin, has prayed for bail in connection with Barama P.S. Case No. 61/2025 under Section 310(2) of BNS, 2023 added Section 61(2)/140(2)/317(3)/310(5)/310(6)/111(2)(b)/111(3)/111(4) of BNS, 2023. 3. The learned counsel for the petitioner submitted that he has been detained in custody since 16.07.2025; most of the alleged stolen materials have already been recovered; he has also custodially examined. 4. The learned Additional Public Prosecutor submits that the petitioner was also identified in the Test Identification Parade (TIP) by the victim/driver of the truck from which the goods were allegedly stolen. The materials on record indicate his complicity as part of a large racket involved in committing highway dacoities in the goods vehicles. In addition to serious incriminating materials, it is also alleged that the petitioner is one of the masterminds of the organization in the alleged offence. Several other cases are stated to be pending against the present petitioner. 5. The voluminous case diary indicates progress in investigation, which however, is not yet completed. The learned Additional Public Prosecutor placed the case diary before the Court flagging the important and relevant portion. The investigation leads supports to the allegation about involvement of the present accused petitioner in the alleged offence. That apart, if some of the materials of the case diary are accepted, they indicate involvement of the accused person in an organized manner by way of vehicle hijacking on road and highway and Page No.# 3/3 committing docoity thereof. 6. Moreover, the materials states that multiple cases pending some of the accused persons in the case. In said facts and circumstances and considering the serious nature of the allegation and the significant incriminating materials, it would not be appropriate to grant bail to the petitioner at this stage. Accordingly, bail application stands rejected at this stage. 7. Send back the case diary. JUDGE Comparing Assistant