Research › Search › Judgment

Calcutta High Court · body

2025 DAILYLAW 18537 (CAL)

AVISHEK SALUI @ BAPI v. STATE OF WEST BENGAL

CRM(M)/113/2025 · 2025-04-23

Suvra Ghosh

body2025

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

April 23, 2025 38 ARDR (Rejected) CRM (DB) 113 of 2025 In Re : An Application for bail under Section 483 of Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita, 2023 filed in connection with Naihati Police Station Case No. 135 of 2023 dated 24/4/2023 under Sections 302/34/120B of the Indian Penal Code. And In Re : Avishek Salui @ Bapi ... Petitioner. Adv. Manjit Singh, Adv. Debabrata Mondal, Adv. Suklyan Naskar, ... for the petitioner. Adv. Kousik Kundu, Adv. Sonali Bhar, ... for the State. Report submitted by the State is taken on record. The petitioner is in custody for about two years and prays for bail. Learned counsel for the State submits that co-accused standing on the same footing as the petitioner has been denied bail. 26 witnesses have been examined and State proposes to examine 4 more witnesses. The trial is expected to conclude within a short time. Considering the material on record, the prayer for bail is rejected at this stage. Learned trial Court is directed to take the proceeding to its logical conclusion as expeditiously as possible, without granting any unnecessary adjournment to either of the parties, in accordance with law. The application for bail is disposed of. Case Diary be returned. 2 Urgent certified website copy of this order, if applied for, be supplied to the parties upon compliance with all requisite formalities. (Suvra Ghosh, J.)