SUYASH PANDEY AND ANOTHER v. STATE OF U.P. THRU. ADDL. CHIEF SECY. HOME U.P. LKO. AND OTHERS
CRLP/2864/2024 · 2025-11-04
Rajnish Kumar, Zafeer Ahmad
body2025
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 185368 (ALL) · dailylaw.ai ]
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 185368 (ALL) · dailylaw.ai ]
Judgment text
Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.
HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT ALLAHABAD LUCKNOW CRIMINAL MISC. WRIT PETITION No. - 2864 of 2024 Court No. - 10 HON'BLE RAJNISH KUMAR, J.
HON'BLE ZAFEER AHMAD, J. 1.Case called out. 2. None appeared on behalf of the petitioner to press this petition nor any request for adjournment or pass over has been made whereas learned A.G.A. for the State is present. 3. This Court had passed the following order on 23.04.2024:-
"Heard leaned counsel for the petitioners, learned AGA on behalf of the State-respondents and perused the record. This writ petition has been filed with a prayer to issue a writ, order or direction in the nature of Certiorari for quashing the First Information Report dated 28.3.2024 registered as Case Crime No. 00172 of 2024 under Sections 498A, 323, 504, 506, 376, 328 IPC and Section 3/4 of D.P. Act, P.S. Akbarpur, District Ambedkar Nagar and for a direction to the respondents not to take any coercive measures against the petitioners pursuant to the impugned FIR. Learned AGA, on the basis of his instructions, states that Sections 376 and 328 IPC are dropped during investigation. At this stage, learned counsel for the petitioners submits that petitioners are ready to settle the dispute between the parties by way of mediation and to show their bona fide to settle the dispute, they are also ready to deposit Rs. 1,00,000/- by way of bank draft in favour of respondent no. 4. He further submits that the said amount may not be refunded, in case, mediation is failed. In case mediation succeeds, the amount may be adjusted in the final settlement. Versus Counsel for Petitioner(s) : Sudhir Kumar Srivastava, Ashish Kumar Singh, Pal Singh Yadav, Prathama Singh Counsel for Respondent(s) : G.A. Suyash Pandey And Another .....Petitioner(s) State Of U.P. Thru. Addl. Chief Secy. Home U.P. Lko. And Others .....Respondent(s)
Learned counsel for the petitioners further submits that he may be granted some time to produce the said bank draft in favour of the respondent no. 4 before this Court. Let the draft of Rs. 1,00,000/- in favour of respondent no. 4 be produced before this Court on 6.5.2024. List this case on 6.5.2024 at 2:15 PM."
4. After passing of the aforesaid order matter has not been pursued by the petitioner, therefore, it appears that either this petition has rendered infructuous or lost its efficacy. 5. . Dismissed accordingly.
November 4, 2025 Shahnaz CRLP No. 2864 of 2024 2 (Zafeer Ahmad,J.) (Rajnish Kumar,J.) Digitally signed by :- SHAHNAZ BANO High Court of Judicature at Allahabad, Lucknow Bench