Page No.# 1/3 GAHC010195552025 2025:GAU-AS:12783 THE GAUHATI HIGH COURT (HIGH COURT OF ASSAM, NAGALAND, MIZORAM AND ARUNACHAL PRADESH) Case No. : I.A.(Crl.)/957/2025 SMTI GOURI ROY W/O LATE NARAYAN ROY, R/O K.P. ROAD, ASHOK PATH, P.S. AND DIST.- DIBRUGARH, ASSAM. VERSUS THE STATE OF ASSAM AND ANR REPRESENTED BY THE PP, ASSAM 2:PRABAHA DEY D/O SUBASH CH. DEY R/O SIGNAL COLONY NO. 1 LINE P.S.- MORIANI DIST.- JORHAT ASSAM Advocate for the Petitioner : MR K J SAIKIA, MR. A K GUPTA,MR. R S MISHRA Advocate for the Respondent : PP, ASSAM, Linked Case : Crl.A./46/2023 RAKESH ROY S/O LATE NARAYAN ROY R/O K.P. ROAD ASHOK PATH Page No.# 2/3 P.S. AND DIST.- DIBRUGARH ASSAM. 2: GOURI ROY W/O LATE NARAYAN ROY R/O K.P. ROAD ASHOK PATH P.S. AND DIST.- DIBRUGARH ASSAM. VERSUS THE STATE OF ASSAM AND ANR. REP. BY THE P.P. ASSAM. 2:PRABAHA DEY D/O SUBASH CH. DEY R/O SIGNAL COLONY NO. 1 LINE P.S.- MORIANI DIST.- JORHAT ASSAM. ------------ Advocate for : MR K J SAIKIA Advocate for : PP ASSAM appearing for THE STATE OF ASSAM AND ANR. BEFORE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE MICHAEL ZOTHANKHUMA HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE ANJAN MONI KALITA ORDER 17.09 .2025 (M. Zothankhuma, J) Heard Mr. R.S. Mishra, learned counsel for the applicant. Also heard Ms. B. Bhuyan, learned Sr. Counsel and Addl. P.P., Assam assisted by Ms. R. Das, Page No.# 3/3 learned counsel. 2. This is an application for suspension of the sentence passed in pursuance to the judgment dated 05.12.2022 and sentence order dated 06.12.2022, by the learned Sessions Judge, Dibrugarh, in Sessions Case No. 164/2013, by which the appellant has been convicted under Section 302 of the IPC and Section 498A of the IPC. 3. The applicant’s counsel submits that the earlier interlocutory application filed by the applicant, i.e. I.A. (Crl.) No.106/2023, seeking bail had been dismissed vide order dated 22.09.2023. The only ground for seeking bail at this stage was due to the old age of the applicant, who is around 80 years of age and as her health condition is not good. 4. Ms. B. Bhuyan, learned Addl. P.P., submits that no new grounds have been made out by the applicant for allowing the application. Accordingly, the same should be dismissed. 5. On considering the fact that no new grounds have been made out by the applicant for release of the applicant on bail, we find no grounds to allow the application. 6. The I.A. is accordingly dismissed. JUDGE JUDGE Comparing Assistant