DIVYANSH BHARDWAJ v. UP STATE ROAD TRANSPORT CORPORATION THRU M.D. LUCKNOW and ANR.
WRIA/5194/2017 · 2025-10-30
Shree Prakash Singh
body2025
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 185333 (ALL) · dailylaw.ai ]
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 185333 (ALL) · dailylaw.ai ]
Judgment text
Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.
HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT ALLAHABAD LUCKNOW WRIT - A No. - 5194 of 2017 Court No. - 18 HON'BLE SHREE PRAKASH SINGH, J.
1. Case called out.
2. None is present for the petitioner to press this writ petition.
3. Learned counsel for the State is present.
4. The writ petition is dismissed for want of prosecution.
5. Interim order, if any, stands vacated.
6. Consigned to records. October 30, 2025 Mayank Versus Counsel for Petitioner(s) : Yatish Gupta, Ashok Kumar Counsel for Respondent(s) : Pradeep Kumar Shukla (Shree Prakash Singh,J.) Divyansh Bhardwaj .....Petitioner(s) Up State Road Transport Corporation Thru M.D. Lucknow And Anr. .....Respondent(s) Digitally signed by :- MAYANK PRATAP SINGH High Court of Judicature at Allahabad, Lucknow Bench