SANTOSH KUMAR SHUKLA v. KUSH TRIPATHI AND 3 OTHERS
A227/1757/2025 · 2025-02-19
Rohit Ranjan Agarwal
body2025
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 18533 (ALL) · dailylaw.ai ]
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 18533 (ALL) · dailylaw.ai ]
Judgment text
Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.
Neutral Citation No. - 2025:AHC:24858
Court No. - 9 Case :- MATTERS UNDER ARTICLE 227 No. - 1757 of 2025 Petitioner :- Santosh Kumar Shukla Respondent :- Kush Tripathi And 3 Others Counsel for Petitioner :- Debee Shanker Pandey Hon'ble Rohit Ranjan Agarwal,J.
1. This is plaintiff's petition. The suit filed by plaintiff was dismissed for want of prosecution. An application under Order IX Rule 9 CPC was preferred which is pending consideration and has been registered as Misc. Case No. 128 of 2021.
2. The sole prayer made in the writ petition is for early disposal of the said application.
3. As no useful purpose would be served in keeping the matter pending, the writ petition is being disposed of, at the admission stage, without calling for counter affidavit or issuing notice to private respondents, with a direction upon Civil Judge (Junior Division)/F.T.C., Court No. 2, Varanasi to decide the Misc. Case No. 128 of 2021 filed in Case No. 1566 of 2018, in accordance with law, after hearing all affected parties, preferably within a period of three months from the date of production of certified copy of this order.
4. With the aforesaid directions, writ petition stands disposed of.
5. It is made clear that this Court has not adjudicated the matter on merits. Order Date :- 20.2.2025 V.S.Singh Digitally signed by :- VIDYA SAGAR SINGH High Court of Judicature at Allahabad