Research › Search › Judgment

Allahabad High Court · body

2025 DAILYLAW 185328 (ALL)

SHIV LAKHAN v. STATE OF U.P. THRU. PRIN. SECY. HOME DEPTT. U.P. LKO. AND ANOTHER

NABAIL/1156/2025 · 2025-11-07

Pankaj Bhatia

body2025

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT ALLAHABAD LUCKNOW CRIMINAL MISC. ANTICIPATORY BAIL APPLICATION U/S 482 BNSS No. - 1156 of 2025 Court No. - 12 HON'BLE PANKAJ BHATIA, J. 1. Heard learned counsel for the applicant as well as learned A.G.A. and perused the record. 2. The present application has been filed under Section 482 of BNSS seeking anticipatory bail apprehending arrest in FIR No.165 of 2025, under Sections 69, 351(3) of BNS, Police Station Inayat Nagar, District Ayodhya. 3. In terms of the FIR, it was alleged that for the last six years, on the false pretext of marriage, physical relations were formed by the applicant and now he is refusing to marry her. The tentative age of the victim is around 24 years. 4. Learned A.G.A. vehemently opposed the bail prayer. 5. Considering the nature of the allegations, I am of the view that the applicant is entitled for the benefit of anticipatory bail. Accordingly, the anticipatory bail application is allowed. 6. In the event of arrest, let the applicant Shiv Lakhan be released on anticipatory bail in the abovesaid first information report number till submission of the charge-sheet on his furnishing personal bond and Versus Counsel for Applicant(s) : Suresh Kumar Mishra, Sudhir Kumar Rai Counsel for Opposite Party(s) : G.A., Abhishek Singh, Ashutosh Mishra Shiv Lakhan .....Applicant(s) State Of U.P. Thru. Prin. Secy. Home Deptt. U.P. Lko. And Another .....Opposite Party(s) sureties of Rs.5,000/- to the satisfaction of the Investigating Officer concerned with the following conditions: (i) The applicant shall make himself available for interrogation by a police officer as and when required and will co-operate with investigation; (ii) The applicant shall not, directly or indirectly, make any inducement, threat or promise to any person acquainted with the facts of the case so as to dissuade him from disclosing such facts to the Court or to any police officer and (iii) The applicant shall not leave India without the previous permission of the Court. November 7, 2025 akverma NABAIL No. 1156 of 2025 2 (Pankaj Bhatia,J.) Digitally signed by :- ASHOK KUMAR VERMA High Court of Judicature at Allahabad, Lucknow Bench