Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.
IN THE HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH::AMARAVATI (Special Original Jurisdiction) a MONDAY,THE SIXTEENTHDAY OF JUNE TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY FIVE ’/l ^9/ W- PRESENT THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE HARINATH.N WRIT PETITION NO: 13753 OF 2025 Between; C C Narayana Raju, S/o. Late C. Papi Raju, Aged about 54 years, residing at Ramaraju Kandriga village, Vadamalapeta Mandal, Tirupati District, A.P ...Petitioner AND
1. The State of Andhra Pradesh, Rep. by Its Principal Secretary, Home Department, Secretariat, Amaravati.
2. The Superintendent of Police, Prakasam Road, Near Town club, Tirupathi, Tirupathi District. 5T7 501.
3. The Deputy Superintendent of Police, Tirupathi Road, Puttur - 517583.
4. The Inspector of Police, Tirupathi Road, Puttur - 517583
5. The Sub-Inspector of Police, Vadamala Peta Police Station, Tirupathi District. f
6. M. Jallaiah, S/o. M.Dhibbaiah , Aged about 60 years, Seetharamapuram AAW, Vadamalapeta Mandal, Tirupati District, A.P
7. M.Ramesh, S/o. M. Jallaiah,,,Aied about 30 years, Seetharamapuram AAW, Vadamalapeta Mandal, iTirupati District, A.P
8. N.Prasad, S/o. Son in jaw' of M. Jallaiah, Aged about 35 years, Seetharamapuram AAW, Vadamajapeta Mandal, Tirupati District, A.P
9. M.Gopi @ Nagoor, S/o.;: Mastanaiah , Aged about 30 years, Seetharamapuram AAW, Vadamalapeta Mandal, Tirupati District, A.P
10. M. Manohar@ Chilakodti, S/o. M Rosaiah , Aged about years, Seetharamapuram AAW, Vadamalapeta Mandal, Tirupati District, A.P
11. N. Venkatesh, S/o M. Jallaiah, aged about 38 years Seetharamapuram AAW, Vadamalapeta Mandal, Tirupati District, A.P. ...Respondents
t'' % Petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of India praying that in affidavit filed therewith, the High Court may direction, more particularly. the t:ircu’ms|ances stated in the tfe pleg^to issue an appropriate writ, order or one in^. natie of Writ of MANDAMUS (D Declaring Complaint dated 29.12.2024, not registering the Respondent Police in 30.01.2025 and 24.02.2025 for the offences committed under Sections 303 11(a) and (d) of The prevention of Nos.6 to 11 and also not 3(5) of BMS, 2023 and sections animals Act, 1960by the Respondent r/w cruelty to Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita, 19 and 21 of the following the procedure under the violative of Articles 14 2023 as illegal, arbitrary direct the Respondent No.5 to and consequently Constitution of India forthwith register the FIR (Crime) and to initiate disciplinary conduct the investigation (2) Directing action under the relevant the Third Respondent No.5 for delinquent of duties and in not Court in the law against the Respondent service following the guidelines
Judgment in Lalita Kumari Vs laid down by the Hon’ble Supreme Government of Utter Pradesh (2014 (2) see 1) lA NO: 1 OF 2025 151 CPC praying that in the circumstances , the High Court may be forthwith register the FIR (Crime) final report under Section under Sections 11(a) and (d) of The prevention of Cbmplaint dated 29.12.2024, 30.01.2025 Petition under Section stated in the affidavit filed in support of the petition pleased to direct the Respondeht5Nb.5 to and conduct investigation and file^ 303 r/w 3(5) of BNS, 2023 and sections cruelty to animals Act, 1960 on tbe ' qnd 24.02.2025 against the Respondent Nos. 6 to 11 : SRI ACHUTARAWIAIAH SRAVANAM No.1 to 5; GP FOR HOME Counsel for the Petitioner Counsel for the Respondents The Court made the following: Order
4 APHC010257332025 IN THE HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH AT AMARAVATI (Special Original Jurisdiction) [3457] I p ■ ■■ MONDAY, THE SIXTEENTH DAY OF JUNE TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY FIVE PRESENT THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE HARINATH.N WRIT PETITION NO: 13753/2025 Between: 0 C Narayana Raju ...PETITIONER AND The State Of Ap and Others ...RESPONDENT(S) Counsel for the Petitioner:
1.ACHUTARAMAIAH SRAVANAM Counsel for the Respondent(S):
1.GP FOR HOME The Court made the following:
2
ORDER:- Heard the learned counsel for the petitioner and the learned Assistant Government Pleader for Home. The learned counsel for the petitioner submits that the petitioner has filed a complaint with the police on 25.12.2024 alleging missing of four cows belonging to the petitioner. It is submitted that the unofficial respondents are behind the missing of the cows and in that respect the complaintwas filed. It is also submitted that the cows were transported in a TATA Ace vehicle, which was also brought to the notice of the 5*^ respondent. In spite of the same, the respondent, in connivance with respondent Nos.6 and 7, has not registered any complaint.
2. Recording the submissions, it is left open for the petitioner to submit a fresh complaint to the respondent, and upon such submission, the 5^^ respondent shall consider the same in accordance with Section 173(3) of the
3.
BNSS, 2023.
4. Accordingly, this Writ Petition is disposed off. No costs. As a sequel, miscellaneous petitions pending, if any, sh^tHtand closed.
SD/- K SRINIVASA RAJU ASSISTANT REGISTRAR //TRUE COPY// 3 ^ ' SECTION OFFICER Se?reTaHafAmaTavafi'''' Department, To,
3. The Deputy Superintendent of Police, Tirupathi Road
4. The Inspector of Police, Tirupathi Road, Puttur - 517583 , Puttur - 517583.
The Sub-Inspector of Police, Vadamala Peta Police Station, Tirupathi District.
One CC to SRI ACHUTARAMAIAH SRAVANAM Advocate [OPUC] Two CCs to GP FOR HOME, High Court of Andhra Pradesh [OUT] Three CD Copies
6.
7.
8. gsg
A HIGH COURT N DATED: 16/06/2025
ORDER WP.No.13753 of 2025 DISPOSING THE WP WITHOUT COSTS