Research › Search › Judgment

High Court of Karnataka · body

2025 DAILYLAW 18531 (KAR)

SRI MUJEEB AHMED SHARIEFF v. M/S MAXWORTH REALITY INDIA LTD.,

CRL.RP/891/2018 · 2025-06-03

Shivashankar Amarannavar

body2025

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

- 1 - HC-KAR NC: 2025:KHC:18638 CRL.RP No. 891 of 2018 IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA AT BENGALURU DATED THIS THE 3RD DAY OF JUNE, 2025 BEFORE THE HON'BLE MR JUSTICE SHIVASHANKAR AMARANNAVAR CRIMINAL REVISION PETITION No. 891 OF 2018 BETWEEN: SRI MUJEEB AHMED SHARIEFF S/O A.R.SHARIEFF, AGED ABOUT 58 YEARS, RESIDING AT HOUSE IN SY.No.62 KURUBARA KARENAHALLI VILLAGE BIDADI HOBLI RAMANAGARA TALUK BENGALURU RURAL DISTRICT -562 109. …PETITIONER (BY SRI. MANU N.P, ADVOCATE - ABSENT) AND: M/S. MAXWORTH REALITY INDIA LTD., A LIMITED COMPANY HAVING ITS OFFICE AT No.22/1, RAILWAY PARALLEL ROAD NEAR SHIVANANDA CIRCLE NEHRU NAGAR, BENGALURU-560 020. REPRESENTED BY ITS AUTHORIZED SIGNATORY SRINIVASA REDDY N. …RESPONDENT (BY SRI. M VINAYA KEERTHY, ADVOCATE) THIS CRL.RP IS FILED UNDER SECTION 397 R/W 401 Cr.P.C PRAYING TO SET ASIDE THE IMPUGNED JUDGMENT AND ORDER OF THE LEARNED 55TH ADDITIONAL CITY CIVIL AND SESSIONS JUDGE, BANGALORE (CCH-56) BANGALORE IN CRL.A.No.873/2014, DATED 28.07.2018, AND THE JUDGMENT AND ORDER OF THE LEARNED XLII ACMM, NRUPATHUNGA Digitally signed by NIRMALA DEVI Location: HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA - 2 - HC-KAR NC: 2025:KHC:18638 CRL.RP No. 891 of 2018 ROAD, BANGALORE CITY, IN C.C.No.2861/2011, DATED 17.07.2014, WHICH IS CONVICTED THE ACCUSED FOR THE OFFENCE PUNISHABLE UNDER SECTION 38 OF THE N.I ACT, CONSEQUENTLY ACQUIT THE ACCUSED FOR SAID OFFENCE AND ETC., THIS PETITION COMING ON FOR REPORTING SETTLEMENT THIS DAY, ORDER WAS MADE THEREIN AS UNDER: CORAM: HON'BLE MR JUSTICE SHIVASHANKAR AMARANNAVAR ORAL ORDER Learned counsel for the petitioner is absent. 2. This Court by the order dated 16.04.2025 has noted the submission of learned counsel for the petitioner that the matter is settled. 3. The absence of learned counsel for the petitioner itself indicates that the petitioner is not interested in prosecuting this matter. 4. Hence, the Criminal Revision Petition is dismissed as settled. Sd/- (SHIVASHANKAR AMARANNAVAR) JUDGE DSP