APHC010256792025 IN THE HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH AT AMARAVATt TUESDAY, THE FIFTH DAY OF AUGUST TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY FIVE PRESENT THE HON’BLE SRI JUSTICE DHIRAJ SINGH THAKUR, CHIEF JUSTICE AND THE HON’BLE SRI JUSTICE RAVI CHEEMALAPATI WRIT APPEAL NO: 724 OF 2025 Writ Appeal under Clause 15 of the Letters Patent against the Order dt. 08.01.2025 in WP No. 31528^ 2024 on the file of the High Court. Between: P Janardhan Naidu, S/o. late P. Venkatesu, Aged 52 years, R/o. Flat No.61, Vidyuth Nagar, Ananthapuramu Town and District. ...Appellant/Respondent Nos.4 AND 1. Santolla Narasimhulu, S/o. late Ramudu, Aged 73 years, Occ. Retired Supdt engineer, Panchayat Raj, R/o. D.NO. 12-4-25, Vidyuth Nagar, Ananthapuram Town and District. ...Writ Petitioner/Respondent 2. The State of Andhra Pradesh, Rep. by its Principal Secretary, Municipal Administration Velagapudi, Guntur District 3. The District Collector, Ananthapur, Ananthapuram District 4. The Ananthapuramu Municipal Coorporation, Rep. by its Commissioner Ananthapur, Ananthapuramu District. Department, Secretariat Buildings ... Respondents /Respondents lA NO: 3 OF 2025 Petition under Section 151 CPC praying that in the circumstances stated ■ in the affidavit filed in support of the petition, the High Court may be pleased to stay the operation of orders dt.08.01.2025 in W.P.No.31528 of 2024 passed by the Hon’ble learned single judge, pending disposal of the writ appeal. r 4 Counsel for the Petitioner: SRI N ASWARTHA NARAYANA Counsel for the Respondent No.3: GP FOR REVENUE Counsel for the Respondent No.4: SRI G VENUGOPAL REDDY Counsel for the Respondent No.1: SRI P NARASIMHULU Counsel for the Respondent No.2; GP FOR MUNCIPAL ADMN AND URBAN DEV The Court made the following order: APHC010256792025 Bench Sr.No:-53 [3483] IN THE HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH AT AMARAVATI WRIT APPEAL NO: 724 of 2025 P. Janardhan Naidu ...Appellant Vs. Santolla Narasimhulu and others ...Respondents ********** Advocate for Appellant Mr. N. Aswartha Narayana Advocates for Respondents Mr. P. Narasimhulu & GP for Muncipal Administration & Urban Development CORAM :THE CHIEF JUSTICE DHIRAJ SINGH THAKUR SRI JUSTICE RAVI CHEEMALAPATI DATE : 5th August 2025 P C : We have heard learned counsel for the appellant. 2. We feel that no good ground is made out in this matter. The directions issued by the learned single Judge are quite innocuous as it only requires the authorities to take action in accordance with law. In case the appellant feels aggrieved of any decision taken by the municipal authorities, he would independently be within his right to challenge the same if there is any procedural or other illegality in passing of those orders. 2 0 HCJ & RCJ W.A.No.724 of 2Q25 3. This Writ Appeal is found to be without any merit and is accordingly, dismissed. No costs. Consequently, connected miscellaneous applications, if any, shall stand closed. Sd/-V.DIWAKAR deputy registrar //TRUE COPY// SE OFFICER To, 1. One CC to Sri N Aswartha Narayana, Advocate [OPUC] 2. Two CCs to GP for Revenue High Court of Andhra Pradesh [OUT] 3. One CC to Sri G Venugopal Reddy, Advocate [OPUC] 4. One CC to Sri P Narasimhulu Advocate [OPUC] 5. Two CCs to GP for Muncipal Admn and Urban Dev, High Court of Andhra Pradesh [OUT] 6. Two CD Copies TF i? HIGH COURT DATED:05/08/2025 ORDER WA NO. 724 OF 2025 DISMISSING THE W.A., WITHOUT COSTS